Someone in the Church has to settle disagreements. This was the role that Christ gave to Peter alone.
1: Even in the Bible Paul corrected Peter for only hanging around former Jews. If that shows Peter has the power alone to settle disagreements then you’ve got a problem.
2: Rome has appealed to other patriarchates for settling disputes. Rome wasn’t the appellate court, it was one of the patriarchates that you could appeal to.
You keep conflating "settling issues" with "fraternal rebuking". Those 2 things are not the same. You may want to look up what each of those things actually means.
Yeah, well, tell that to Pope St. Leo the Great who flatly rejected Canon 28 of the Council of Chalcedon. Your beloved Patriarch of Constantinople was put in his place. Cope.
You keep conflating "settling issues" with "fraternal rebuking".
No.
Yeah, well, tell that to Pope St. Leo the Great who flatly rejected Canon 28 of the Council of Chalcedon
Pope Leo also anathematized pope honorius showing the gates of hell prevailed against your entire papacy. I don’t rely on the opinion of any one bishop, especially the patriarch of Constantinople. It’s not a big deal. Your wacky views on the papacy make it a problem for you. Not for me.
When we have a bishop in error, he’s just that a bishop in error. We do not claim any man is without error.
1: Even in the Bible Paul corrected Peter for only hanging around former Jews. If that shows Peter has the power alone to settle disagreements then you’ve got a problem.
2: Rome has appealed to other patriarchates for settling disputes. Rome wasn’t the appellate court, it was one of the patriarchates that you could appeal to.
You keep conflating "settling issues" with "fraternal rebuking". Those 2 things are not the same. You may want to look up what each of those things actually means.
Yeah, well, tell that to Pope St. Leo the Great who flatly rejected Canon 28 of the Council of Chalcedon. Your beloved Patriarch of Constantinople was put in his place. Cope.
No.
Pope Leo also anathematized pope honorius showing the gates of hell prevailed against your entire papacy. I don’t rely on the opinion of any one bishop, especially the patriarch of Constantinople. It’s not a big deal. Your wacky views on the papacy make it a problem for you. Not for me.
When we have a bishop in error, he’s just that a bishop in error. We do not claim any man is without error.