Fraternal rebuke doesn't mean one has jurisdiction over another... We can all rebuke and admonish our superiors if they commit public sin.
The gates of Hell never prevailed because the Pope never changed Catholic teaching. The Pope has to OFFICIALLY change Catholic teaching in Faith or Morals for the Gates of Hell to prevail. This didn't happen with Popes Honorius, Vigilius, John XXII, nor the post Vat II Popes. They may say heretical things, but no heresy has been officially and formally promulgated.
Sergius promulgated the belief that Jesus Christ had two natures but one will, known as Monothelitism.
So you blame the pope for following the error of the patriarch of Constantinople. Why didn’t the pope decide if he’s supreme, why did he fall into the same error?
This is the difference we view the church as the pillar of truth not any fallible man.
Popes are human too and make mistakes. Neither papal supremacy nor the Dogma of papal infallibility suggest that the pope is incapable of making mistakes. All popes have made mistakes at one time or another. Even St. Peter made mistakes: He denied Christ 3 times, plunged into the water because he doubted Christ, dared to rebuke Christ, cut off a guy's ear after being told to stand down, refused to eat with gentiles... And he is not only the first Pope but also a Saint!
Someone in the Church has to settle disagreements. This was the role that Christ gave to Peter alone.
Fraternal rebuke doesn't mean one has jurisdiction over another... We can all rebuke and admonish our superiors if they commit public sin.
The gates of Hell never prevailed because the Pope never changed Catholic teaching. The Pope has to OFFICIALLY change Catholic teaching in Faith or Morals for the Gates of Hell to prevail. This didn't happen with Popes Honorius, Vigilius, John XXII, nor the post Vat II Popes. They may say heretical things, but no heresy has been officially and formally promulgated.
Why do you think Honorius got anathematized?
He taught the heresy of monothelitism and was posthumously anahematized for teaching improperly his whole career.
He literally got popped for changing Catholic teachings during his reign.
No, he was anathematized for allowing Sergius's heresy.
Monothelitism was never formally taught by Rome.
Sergius promulgated the belief that Jesus Christ had two natures but one will, known as Monothelitism.
So you blame the pope for following the error of the patriarch of Constantinople. Why didn’t the pope decide if he’s supreme, why did he fall into the same error?
This is the difference we view the church as the pillar of truth not any fallible man.
Popes are human too and make mistakes. Neither papal supremacy nor the Dogma of papal infallibility suggest that the pope is incapable of making mistakes. All popes have made mistakes at one time or another. Even St. Peter made mistakes: He denied Christ 3 times, plunged into the water because he doubted Christ, dared to rebuke Christ, cut off a guy's ear after being told to stand down, refused to eat with gentiles... And he is not only the first Pope but also a Saint!
Someone in the Church has to settle disagreements. This was the role that Christ gave to Peter alone.