Who owns your body? (A conversation with THRIVE and VAXXED Filmmakers)
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
Copulatio verborum indicat acceptationem in eodum sensu.
a) both agreement (want) vs disagreement (not want) ignores the need to adapt to origin. It doesn't matter if one accepts or rejects breathing...nature forces one to breathe.
b) suggested words (fiction) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (reality), hence ignoring the conjunction between partial (perceiving) and whole (perceivable). Nature doesn't use words to communicate itself...
Wrong. I am of nature, I use words...Are you of nature?
a) wrong implies versus right aka ones choice to want (right) vs not want (wrong) the suggested information by another.
b) if one applies right (want) vs wrong (not want) to breathing, then one can comprehend that one needs to breathe, no matter if one wants or not wants to.
c) WRONG, adjective - "wrung, twisted or turned from a straight line or even surface"...aka ones ignorance of being (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).
a) NATURE, noun - "born, produced"...the product (life) is still in the process (inception towards death).
b) to be processed implies to be moved forwards, which implies for those existing within forward motion (velocity) to represent resistance aka the struggle to resist (living) the temptation of being moved (dying).
c) if velocity meets resistance, then that generates friction; vibration...sound.
d) being choice within the momentum (balance) of moving sound implies one to represent resonance (need) or dissonance (want), hence resonance sustains life, while dissonance tempts towards death.
e) every word is shaped out of perceivable sound. The suggestion of every word represents the temptation to ignore perceivable sound.
f) choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law tempts one to ignore balance (perceivable) towards choice (perceiving) natural law.
g) if one consents to what another suggests; then one ignores the only origin for oneself; all others and whatever is being shaped within...hence the ongoing generator (process of dying) for every reactor (living) within.
a) one doesn't need the agreement (want) or disagreement (not want) from other ones about perceivable reality...one needs to grow self discernment within perceivable reality, while struggling to resist suggested fiction.
b) Sleight of hand:
From your perspective - "I am whatever you say I am; because if I wasn't, then why would I say I am?"
From my perspective - "the way (inception towards death) I am (life)"
c) to ask a question implies want for suggested outcomes (answer), which tempts one to ignore being temporary problem (living) within the solution of the ongoing natural order (process of dying)...hence struggling to resist being dissolved.
tl;dr...every suggested word (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable sound (reality)...the latter implies a moving system; while the former represents a temporary idol; brand; label for something within a constantly moving system.
This is why the few can effortlessly contradict any suggested word the many consent to believe to represent "truth" or "false".