Who owns your body? (A conversation with THRIVE and VAXXED Filmmakers)
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
a) the living (temporary partial) cannot own anything within the process of dying (ongoing whole)...only utilize everything for the sustenance of self.
b) the few suggest ownership to tempt each one of the many to ignore being the vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death).
Sure one can pretend to own the current (currency) or the banks (riverbanks) or that a docked ore (doctor) will help to steer course etc. but holding onto anything doesn't keep the vessel (living) from drowning (dying)...
AI wants us to forget about property rights and free will. We know who we are and AI does not stand a chance. AI has chosen the wrong species to mess with and I think it knows it by now. :) Resistance is futile.
a) PROP'ERTY, noun - "a peculiar quality of any thing; that which is inherent in a subject, or naturally essential to it"...the process of dying represents all perceivable value, while each one living within represents the perceiving evaluation. Enacting value for reacting evaluation.
b) RIGHT, adjective (Latin rectus, rego) - "to strain; stretch, straight; strained; stretched to straightness"...being alive implies being stretched from inception towards death, hence a lifespan aka SPAN, noun (Latin pando) - "to strain, stretch, extend".
c) "free" will of choice implies within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom...reaction (choice) within enacting (balance). Choice can only exist within the center of balance; while balance (momentum) can only exist within the center of motion.
Temporary living within the ongoing process of dying implies one to be resistance (living) within temptation (dying), hence the more one struggles to resist the natural order, the longer one stays alive within it.
Resistance is fertile.
Both "not" (nothing) and "chance" (effect of an unknown cause) represent suggested fiction as the inversion of perceivable reality...being one-thing (living partial) within everything (whole process of dying) and therefore the reacting effect (living) of the generating cause (process of dying).
Copulatio verborum indicat acceptationem in eodum sensu.
a) both agreement (want) vs disagreement (not want) ignores the need to adapt to origin. It doesn't matter if one accepts or rejects breathing...nature forces one to breathe.
b) suggested words (fiction) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (reality), hence ignoring the conjunction between partial (perceiving) and whole (perceivable). Nature doesn't use words to communicate itself...