I have good income. I have no debt (no mortgage even). I'm cheap AF.
And my savings was flat...
This does not really make much sense. This implies your cost of living exceeded your capability to produce savings. Or just too much on the latest leftist wearables?
In reality, if you were making 'good income' and 'no debt' then you would have enough to pay for your existence and then save additionally.
This also implies you have consumed prior savings from previous years where the current issues were not yet in existence. This whole shit smells like bullshit. You are lying again.
Every grocery store has a few items that they sell at the cheapest price. Watch the per unit price of everything you buy and find the best price for each item. Some thing are seasonal like baking goods (including butter) and ham (Christmas & Easter). Bulk up enough when there is a good sale to get you to the next sale.
Costco is expensive on most thing. I only buy gas and English cucumbers from Costco. Everything else is cheaper at other stores.
In reality, if you were making 'good income' and 'no debt' then you would have enough to pay for your existence and then save additionally.
Or maybe, just maybe, consumer inflation in the Western world is ~20% YoY and our banks are devaluing our currencies asymptotically, thereby making every second spent working worth less in pay than the previous second.
But you’ll reject that suggestion (it’s not one, really; it’s a statement of objective truth) sight unseen because the person who suggested it to you 1. proved you wrong on the internet and 2. hurt your sophistic feelings while doing so.
Again, more piss poor half wit logic from you, not a surprise given your khazarian upbringing.
When you say 'good money' then you are setting a specific barrier, which is 'above barely' enough.
People with 'barely enough' are still able to survive, which implies that people with 'good money' should be still producing savings, albeit much less but at least not consuming savings.
Being that I am also living through it and having all the same experiences all my other countrymen are having, then I can assert that if you are making 'good money' then the increase in costs outbound is still less than your earnings, by a margin large enough to produce at least a small savings.
You have never proven me wrong, you threw an allegation at me and refuse to back it up with evidence and then like the typical hook nose you attempt to put it on me, you have no idea about anything you cannot follow law, you cannot even follow logic.
And you have not even come close to my 'feelings'
dirty hook nose khazarian knob gobbler, go away you are a shitty shill.
No, it’s pretty damn subjective with only that phrase to go on.
implies that
No, this is your assertion. It does not have to be shared by others because there is nothing objective in the terminology by which to externally define the amount of earnings or savings.
is still less than
No, because “making good money” only attaches a subjective degree to income, not to outlay. “Making good money and spending bad money” would imply outlays above inlays, but that’s not what was said. “Good money” can be seven, six, or even five digits, depending on the person or situation. It’s entirely subjective without further context.
Just a constant barrage of incorrect brainless rhetoric from you huh?
So, It is not subjective when reading words to apply the descriptors appropriately.
You read it like he said "I make money", that is not what was written, this is perhaps a clear indication to how weak your ability is to interpret words written and just general comprehension of the language.
When you say 'good money' it is absolutely a reference to making more than what is considered your minimum, realizing that each position is in context with respect to the communicator.
It does not matter which digit is involved, it is irrelevant.
So, I did not materialize the implication, it was inferred by the author.
Your khazarian mannerism are worthless here, have no effect on me. Your lies and logical fallacies are just more evidence to how you are simply not on par.
This does not really make much sense. This implies your cost of living exceeded your capability to produce savings. Or just too much on the latest leftist wearables?
In reality, if you were making 'good income' and 'no debt' then you would have enough to pay for your existence and then save additionally.
This also implies you have consumed prior savings from previous years where the current issues were not yet in existence. This whole shit smells like bullshit. You are lying again.
Every grocery store has a few items that they sell at the cheapest price. Watch the per unit price of everything you buy and find the best price for each item. Some thing are seasonal like baking goods (including butter) and ham (Christmas & Easter). Bulk up enough when there is a good sale to get you to the next sale.
Costco is expensive on most thing. I only buy gas and English cucumbers from Costco. Everything else is cheaper at other stores.
Well shit bro, then you must not be making good money.
Shopping at costco at least reveals you have some degree of wealth as people complaining as you are generally cannot.
Odds are you are enslaved and not getting paid your value so you live within the predefined pattern planned by the people who have you entrapped.
Which explains why you cannot rely on savings from prior years.
This part of what you are saying has merit, there are crushing forces at work against all people, and lots of people have fallen into problems.
Realize that there is division and you can split it three ways.
The outside edges are getting eroded at record pace, the internal area is still buffered by them for now.
How'd you free yourself from wage bondage
Or maybe, just maybe, consumer inflation in the Western world is ~20% YoY and our banks are devaluing our currencies asymptotically, thereby making every second spent working worth less in pay than the previous second.
But you’ll reject that suggestion (it’s not one, really; it’s a statement of objective truth) sight unseen because the person who suggested it to you 1. proved you wrong on the internet and 2. hurt your sophistic feelings while doing so.
And now everything has a fuckin fee also.....some "transaction fee" or shit is getting much more common.
Again, more piss poor half wit logic from you, not a surprise given your khazarian upbringing.
When you say 'good money' then you are setting a specific barrier, which is 'above barely' enough.
People with 'barely enough' are still able to survive, which implies that people with 'good money' should be still producing savings, albeit much less but at least not consuming savings.
Being that I am also living through it and having all the same experiences all my other countrymen are having, then I can assert that if you are making 'good money' then the increase in costs outbound is still less than your earnings, by a margin large enough to produce at least a small savings.
You have never proven me wrong, you threw an allegation at me and refuse to back it up with evidence and then like the typical hook nose you attempt to put it on me, you have no idea about anything you cannot follow law, you cannot even follow logic.
And you have not even come close to my 'feelings'
dirty hook nose khazarian knob gobbler, go away you are a shitty shill.
No, it’s pretty damn subjective with only that phrase to go on.
No, this is your assertion. It does not have to be shared by others because there is nothing objective in the terminology by which to externally define the amount of earnings or savings.
No, because “making good money” only attaches a subjective degree to income, not to outlay. “Making good money and spending bad money” would imply outlays above inlays, but that’s not what was said. “Good money” can be seven, six, or even five digits, depending on the person or situation. It’s entirely subjective without further context.
Scream for me.
Just a constant barrage of incorrect brainless rhetoric from you huh?
So, It is not subjective when reading words to apply the descriptors appropriately.
You read it like he said "I make money", that is not what was written, this is perhaps a clear indication to how weak your ability is to interpret words written and just general comprehension of the language.
When you say 'good money' it is absolutely a reference to making more than what is considered your minimum, realizing that each position is in context with respect to the communicator.
It does not matter which digit is involved, it is irrelevant.
So, I did not materialize the implication, it was inferred by the author.
Your khazarian mannerism are worthless here, have no effect on me. Your lies and logical fallacies are just more evidence to how you are simply not on par.