Can you show me anything created without all the ingredients to create already being available?
What if shaping out of preexisting implies transmutation out of origin? What if others suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything)?
If one consents to suggested creationism, then doesn't that imply hurting oneself?
complete and total destruction of all life
a) what if each one represents a temporary partial and incomplete within an ongoing whole completeness?
b) what if living within the process of dying implies the "destruction of all life"...as well as the generation of all life aka growth within loss?
c) what if the few simply exploit the many who willingly ignore to sustain themselves within the process of dying; while using suggested narratives to tempt them to follow (want) instead of resisting (need)?
d) what if reactors (living) within a generator (process of dying) cannot destroy all life; only ignore ongoing regeneration of life, while temporarily destroy themselves over and over again until they choose to resist the temptation thereof?
complete annihilation
ANNIHILA'TION, noun - "the act of reducing to nothing or non-existence"...anyone care to explain the existence of non-existence while existing within everything perceivable?
How could partial (one thing) within complete (every thing) reduce to no thing?
Look at what it did to Mars.
I'm still snickering about that...
life will survive
What if life has will to survive aka free will of choice to adapt as the living while struggling to sustain self in the process of dying?
Sleight of hand: "Where There’s a Will There’s a Way" aka when there's a way (inception towards death) there's a will (life).
Can you show me anything created without all the ingredients to create already being available?
What if shaping out of preexisting implies transmutation out of origin? What if others suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything)?
If one consents to suggested creationism, then doesn't that imply hurting oneself?
a) what if each one represents a temporary partial and incomplete within an ongoing whole completeness?
b) what if living within the process of dying implies the "destruction of all life"...as well as the generation of all life aka growth within loss?
c) what if the few simply exploit the many who willingly ignore to sustain themselves within the process of dying; while using suggested narratives to tempt them to follow (want) instead of resisting (need)?
d) what if reactors (living) within a generator (process of dying) cannot destroy all life; only ignore ongoing regeneration of life, while temporarily destroy themselves over and over again until they choose to resist the temptation thereof?
ANNIHILA'TION, noun - "the act of reducing to nothing or non-existence"...anyone care to explain the existence of non-existence while existing within everything perceivable?
How could partial (one thing) within complete (every thing) reduce to no thing?
I'm still snickering about that...
What if life has will to survive aka free will of choice to adapt as the living while struggling to sustain self in the process of dying?
Sleight of hand: "Where There’s a Will There’s a Way" aka when there's a way (inception towards death) there's a will (life).