Ha, how long? They've dug up ancient bones and found genomic evidence of Trisomy 21. And how "modern" on the vaccine regiment? Cowpox inoculation for smallpox was around the dawn of the 19th century, while Down's was first characterized in Western medicine around the mid 19th century. I think chromosomal staining for detection was late 19th/early 20th century.
History aside - Trisomy 21 always comes first. It can be detected the womb just as soon as you can detect fetal cells in the mother's blood (around 9 weeks last I checked). Amniocentesis gives the best information for diagnosis, but regardless, we can see if there are chromosomal anomalies long before the first vaccine is even considered for the infant.
Yes but you seemed to just suggest a correlation between vaccines and Trisomy 21 that is in contradiction to your conclusion.
We can only find evidence of Trisomy 21 dating back to middle of 19th century. Just decades after vaccine shots were first introduced? That seems to suggest cause/effect relationship.
Now if you were able to show me evidence of trisomy 21 dating back to ancient times then I would agree with you. For example, large gravesites of sacrificed children in Aztec and Mayan civilization ruins. No signs of down syndrome in massive grave sites of dead children dating back hundreds of years?
I'm debating for debate sake. I have no hard line stance or investment in what the right answer is.
Ha, how long? They've dug up ancient bones and found genomic evidence of Trisomy 21. And how "modern" on the vaccine regiment? Cowpox inoculation for smallpox was around the dawn of the 19th century, while Down's was first characterized in Western medicine around the mid 19th century. I think chromosomal staining for detection was late 19th/early 20th century.
History aside - Trisomy 21 always comes first. It can be detected the womb just as soon as you can detect fetal cells in the mother's blood (around 9 weeks last I checked). Amniocentesis gives the best information for diagnosis, but regardless, we can see if there are chromosomal anomalies long before the first vaccine is even considered for the infant.
Yes but you seemed to just suggest a correlation between vaccines and Trisomy 21 that is in contradiction to your conclusion.
We can only find evidence of Trisomy 21 dating back to middle of 19th century. Just decades after vaccine shots were first introduced? That seems to suggest cause/effect relationship.
Now if you were able to show me evidence of trisomy 21 dating back to ancient times then I would agree with you. For example, large gravesites of sacrificed children in Aztec and Mayan civilization ruins. No signs of down syndrome in massive grave sites of dead children dating back hundreds of years?
I'm debating for debate sake. I have no hard line stance or investment in what the right answer is.