Cool. Just like Iceland "eradicated Down Syndrome." Like, no you didn't. Not in a medical sense; you can't cure Down Syndrome. You just killed all the people with Down Syndrome.
If the prescription for every type of cancer is a medical-grade bullet to the head, you can't claim you cured or eradicated cancer. Well I suppose you could, but you'd be wrong.
Anyway those groups won't condemn the plan because they don't consider it unethical. Life has no value to them except to be the best-functioning slave you can be with the off-chance that you might become or be born into being less of a slave than other people.
It's not reasonable. Down's is Trisomy 21, meaning you have an extra chromosome 21 (you should have 2, if you have 3 you have Down's, putting the tri in Trisomy). Chromosomes are large sets of genes. Incorporating a single extra gene is problematic enough; incorporating an entire extra chromosome through injection (well, and having the subject survive) is just not currently possible. We can barely do it in E. coli, which are much simpler and much more resilient than humans as you probably know.
Now, in 10, 20, 50 years? Maybe. But incorporated-gene therapy has been the holy grail of synthetic biology in medicine since the discovery of DNA, and so far we haven't had much success. The best we've done is free-floating DNA/RNA + delivered to cells by lipids or adenoviruses. But still once we reliably cross the hurdle of incorporating a single gene into a human genome without killing the patient (and CRISPR/Cas9 will probably facilitate this), that's still a far cry from incorporating an entire chromosome of 200-600 genes (depending on the chromosome) all at once.
Cool. Just like Iceland "eradicated Down Syndrome." Like, no you didn't. Not in a medical sense; you can't cure Down Syndrome. You just killed all the people with Down Syndrome.
If the prescription for every type of cancer is a medical-grade bullet to the head, you can't claim you cured or eradicated cancer. Well I suppose you could, but you'd be wrong.
Anyway those groups won't condemn the plan because they don't consider it unethical. Life has no value to them except to be the best-functioning slave you can be with the off-chance that you might become or be born into being less of a slave than other people.
down syndrone comes from vaxx as well
Do you have any evidence of this?
I think it's a reasonable hypothesis. Just wondering if anyone has researched it and found supportive evidence.
It's not reasonable. Down's is Trisomy 21, meaning you have an extra chromosome 21 (you should have 2, if you have 3 you have Down's, putting the tri in Trisomy). Chromosomes are large sets of genes. Incorporating a single extra gene is problematic enough; incorporating an entire extra chromosome through injection (well, and having the subject survive) is just not currently possible. We can barely do it in E. coli, which are much simpler and much more resilient than humans as you probably know.
Now, in 10, 20, 50 years? Maybe. But incorporated-gene therapy has been the holy grail of synthetic biology in medicine since the discovery of DNA, and so far we haven't had much success. The best we've done is free-floating DNA/RNA + delivered to cells by lipids or adenoviruses. But still once we reliably cross the hurdle of incorporating a single gene into a human genome without killing the patient (and CRISPR/Cas9 will probably facilitate this), that's still a far cry from incorporating an entire chromosome of 200-600 genes (depending on the chromosome) all at once.
Again, to reiterate, and keep the patient alive.
Is there evidence of downs syndrome in human beings long before any modern era vaccine regimen?
A positive answer to that would suggest that down syndrome has no correlation with vaccine regimens and pre-exists it.
Thanks for your other valuable input.