Cool. Just like Iceland "eradicated Down Syndrome." Like, no you didn't. Not in a medical sense; you can't cure Down Syndrome. You just killed all the people with Down Syndrome.
If the prescription for every type of cancer is a medical-grade bullet to the head, you can't claim you cured or eradicated cancer. Well I suppose you could, but you'd be wrong.
Anyway those groups won't condemn the plan because they don't consider it unethical. Life has no value to them except to be the best-functioning slave you can be with the off-chance that you might become or be born into being less of a slave than other people.
Lot of things come with vaxs. Where are the 60 year old autistics but now its like 1 in 50 get autism and higher in military wonder why military? Maybe something in their body since gov jabs them with everything. Some say the 60 year old autistics are around we are just better diagnosing them now. 1 in 50. They are already working on a cure for it but question is whether pharma will let it be released. Worked with a 8yr old who took the treatment. Saw a significant difference.
https://health.ucsd.edu/news/topics/Suramin-Autism/Pages/default.aspx
Cant find it but there was a video of a guy that could tell using 13-14 different observations of the face and eye orientation based off his training that a person had a mini stroke and where in the brain based off of their eye orientation. He could also use pictures taken of the person before a jab to show proof. Without a vax your eyes should be equal, but anyone that has a shift in one eye in any direction has had a mini stroke. They wont know becus there are no nerves in the brain. Im sure all of us have some signs of this.
It's not reasonable. Down's is Trisomy 21, meaning you have an extra chromosome 21 (you should have 2, if you have 3 you have Down's, putting the tri in Trisomy). Chromosomes are large sets of genes. Incorporating a single extra gene is problematic enough; incorporating an entire extra chromosome through injection (well, and having the subject survive) is just not currently possible. We can barely do it in E. coli, which are much simpler and much more resilient than humans as you probably know.
Now, in 10, 20, 50 years? Maybe. But incorporated-gene therapy has been the holy grail of synthetic biology in medicine since the discovery of DNA, and so far we haven't had much success. The best we've done is free-floating DNA/RNA + delivered to cells by lipids or adenoviruses. But still once we reliably cross the hurdle of incorporating a single gene into a human genome without killing the patient (and CRISPR/Cas9 will probably facilitate this), that's still a far cry from incorporating an entire chromosome of 200-600 genes (depending on the chromosome) all at once.
I read it somewhere ages ago. Didn't save it. When you inject children with the most inbred dna possible, which you know has that, then you end up with white children with down syndrome.
Cool. Just like Iceland "eradicated Down Syndrome." Like, no you didn't. Not in a medical sense; you can't cure Down Syndrome. You just killed all the people with Down Syndrome.
If the prescription for every type of cancer is a medical-grade bullet to the head, you can't claim you cured or eradicated cancer. Well I suppose you could, but you'd be wrong.
Anyway those groups won't condemn the plan because they don't consider it unethical. Life has no value to them except to be the best-functioning slave you can be with the off-chance that you might become or be born into being less of a slave than other people.
Lot of things come with vaxs. Where are the 60 year old autistics but now its like 1 in 50 get autism and higher in military wonder why military? Maybe something in their body since gov jabs them with everything. Some say the 60 year old autistics are around we are just better diagnosing them now. 1 in 50. They are already working on a cure for it but question is whether pharma will let it be released. Worked with a 8yr old who took the treatment. Saw a significant difference. https://health.ucsd.edu/news/topics/Suramin-Autism/Pages/default.aspx
Cant find it but there was a video of a guy that could tell using 13-14 different observations of the face and eye orientation based off his training that a person had a mini stroke and where in the brain based off of their eye orientation. He could also use pictures taken of the person before a jab to show proof. Without a vax your eyes should be equal, but anyone that has a shift in one eye in any direction has had a mini stroke. They wont know becus there are no nerves in the brain. Im sure all of us have some signs of this.
down syndrone comes from vaxx as well
Do you have any evidence of this?
I think it's a reasonable hypothesis. Just wondering if anyone has researched it and found supportive evidence.
It's not reasonable. Down's is Trisomy 21, meaning you have an extra chromosome 21 (you should have 2, if you have 3 you have Down's, putting the tri in Trisomy). Chromosomes are large sets of genes. Incorporating a single extra gene is problematic enough; incorporating an entire extra chromosome through injection (well, and having the subject survive) is just not currently possible. We can barely do it in E. coli, which are much simpler and much more resilient than humans as you probably know.
Now, in 10, 20, 50 years? Maybe. But incorporated-gene therapy has been the holy grail of synthetic biology in medicine since the discovery of DNA, and so far we haven't had much success. The best we've done is free-floating DNA/RNA + delivered to cells by lipids or adenoviruses. But still once we reliably cross the hurdle of incorporating a single gene into a human genome without killing the patient (and CRISPR/Cas9 will probably facilitate this), that's still a far cry from incorporating an entire chromosome of 200-600 genes (depending on the chromosome) all at once.
Again, to reiterate, and keep the patient alive.
Is there evidence of downs syndrome in human beings long before any modern era vaccine regimen?
A positive answer to that would suggest that down syndrome has no correlation with vaccine regimens and pre-exists it.
Thanks for your other valuable input.
I read it somewhere ages ago. Didn't save it. When you inject children with the most inbred dna possible, which you know has that, then you end up with white children with down syndrome.
Good.