You don't EVER spend millions, let alone hundreds of thousands of dollars on a campaign
First of all, you wrote that backwards.
Secondly, yes you do. You must not understand how corporations work. There is often little oversight and, when there is, it's often a bunch of people who don't care. Middle managers are worthless and they are the "oversight."
A lot of these things are hidden. A court document, a address to a doctor's office with a hilarious name, etc. These things wouldn't be caught by any sort of "oversight." Even when there is oversight, it's not a pixel by pixel analysis. It's a quick look over and a rubberstamp.
While I see some merit in what you say, I keep asking myself "So I am expected to believe that this address was on some random piece of paper that they just so happened to throw on the table that was going to be photographed for a multimillion-dollar ad campaign and the address just so happens to connect to someone named Epstein?".
Really, I have lost my ability to simply accept randomness.
For those and many other factors just in this ad campaign, the odds that all of this just randomly aligned is incalculable. For distraction or for messaging, this was all set up this way for a reason...
Never once did I say it was random. Someone clearly did it intentionally. The question is who that person was, who else knew about it, and, most importantly, why they did it.
Whoever made this ad is a massive lone troll. Or this is an intentional viral marketing campaign.
I don't buy that the company put this in there in order to send a message to their fellow cult members or whatever you guys think.
First of all, you wrote that backwards.
Secondly, yes you do. You must not understand how corporations work. There is often little oversight and, when there is, it's often a bunch of people who don't care. Middle managers are worthless and they are the "oversight."
A lot of these things are hidden. A court document, a address to a doctor's office with a hilarious name, etc. These things wouldn't be caught by any sort of "oversight." Even when there is oversight, it's not a pixel by pixel analysis. It's a quick look over and a rubberstamp.
While I see some merit in what you say, I keep asking myself "So I am expected to believe that this address was on some random piece of paper that they just so happened to throw on the table that was going to be photographed for a multimillion-dollar ad campaign and the address just so happens to connect to someone named Epstein?".
Really, I have lost my ability to simply accept randomness.
For those and many other factors just in this ad campaign, the odds that all of this just randomly aligned is incalculable. For distraction or for messaging, this was all set up this way for a reason...
Never once did I say it was random. Someone clearly did it intentionally. The question is who that person was, who else knew about it, and, most importantly, why they did it.