Soldiering for ages, since the dawn of civilization used to be some of the most upstanding roles in society. You weren't a member of society unless you served your nation.
Today, no. Today, there's not that duty, or service. It creates wealth instead. These people aren't loyal to anything else.
Why are you denigrating people who serve their nation. You won't win there. It doesn't make you valued. They do a job you won't. It perhaps isn't in your interests or support. But it's a job none the less, a job serving more than themselves.
It's not murder if it's necessary. Have a think about what that actually means, before spouting spurious ideals. Your ideology imposes murder is a sin. What if it protects you from being murdered. There is no sin. Even if it doesn't persay because it is national interest. That reason is untenable to the job they perform.
Go back to where you've assumed your ideology and find since the creation of religion, it supported warfare. First Gods all had soldiers, or angels, or whatever. There were the gods of war and justice. Jesus never condemned soldiers if in revelations there are the armies of heaven. Religion has supported war, whether by the Heavens or on Earth.
No, soldiers are an integral part of society, and they have been religiously, and societally, since the dawn of civilizations.
You have turned them into robots instead of the courageous heroes they are. Doing a job protecting you. Or a job you won't. They serve a higher purpose one that acts for your nation. It isn't self interest. You're right. It's a common purpose.
It unfortunately is a job that questions their ideals and not everyone is suited to it. But everyone professes they will if it came to it, defense of their home. You would defend yourself and your home.
Your argument becomes ridiculous. It isn't murder if it's necessary. Stopping murders or providing justice by punishing those doing your nation wrong.
Whether you agree or not. You would defend yourself and your home if it came to it. It's not murder than is it. Obviously subjected to the laws of your nation.
You made no distinction. You said murder. But, war is war. There is no innocence in war, and not to those fighting it, because there is only warfare. Where the innocent can be caught up in it. They weren't aware, they weren't prepared, they need refuge. Cry me a river. Of course they are. They're also fighting or supporting it.
War is not murder, it is war. Self defense, offense, justice, gain, loss, victory, surrender.
You are under the assumption war is something else. You are trying to create an ideology for war. There is none. There is only victory, surrender, truce, or peace. Meanwhile in your hypocrisy you just supported war. As I strangely knew you would. You just said self defense. What is that, disagreeing with your enemy? Hahaha.
Yes, the innocent pay for their nations acting on it. But they're not innocent if they support the guilty. It doesn't mean kill them, I am sure it does, terms and conditions applied.
Am I condoning murder, no. I don't believe when there's peace people should be murdered unless they're guilty of murder, or such. But I am supporting war. It is a decider. A leveller. A judgment. A reaper. A service. A duty. Etc etc etc. Until any peace can come to agreeable terms and truce.
You seem to be under this other assumption you can decide what murder is? You're calling war, an attacker, a murderer. But innocently you're just the defender. Planet stupid. Hey guys I am gonna buy all these weapons to defend myself, but god forbid I get attacked with them. No, what? You just sat there while somebody else bought all those weapons to defend your home, and god forbid they get attacked because it's so unfair?
Yawn.
This post is ridiculous.
Soldiering for ages, since the dawn of civilization used to be some of the most upstanding roles in society. You weren't a member of society unless you served your nation.
Today, no. Today, there's not that duty, or service. It creates wealth instead. These people aren't loyal to anything else.
Why are you denigrating people who serve their nation. You won't win there. It doesn't make you valued. They do a job you won't. It perhaps isn't in your interests or support. But it's a job none the less, a job serving more than themselves.
It's not murder if it's necessary. Have a think about what that actually means, before spouting spurious ideals. Your ideology imposes murder is a sin. What if it protects you from being murdered. There is no sin. Even if it doesn't persay because it is national interest. That reason is untenable to the job they perform.
Go back to where you've assumed your ideology and find since the creation of religion, it supported warfare. First Gods all had soldiers, or angels, or whatever. There were the gods of war and justice. Jesus never condemned soldiers if in revelations there are the armies of heaven. Religion has supported war, whether by the Heavens or on Earth.
Yawn. Innocent I think not. War has no innocence. Live by the sword die by the sword. A job.
No, soldiers are an integral part of society, and they have been religiously, and societally, since the dawn of civilizations.
You have turned them into robots instead of the courageous heroes they are. Doing a job protecting you. Or a job you won't. They serve a higher purpose one that acts for your nation. It isn't self interest. You're right. It's a common purpose.
It unfortunately is a job that questions their ideals and not everyone is suited to it. But everyone professes they will if it came to it, defense of their home. You would defend yourself and your home.
Your argument becomes ridiculous. It isn't murder if it's necessary. Stopping murders or providing justice by punishing those doing your nation wrong.
Whether you agree or not. You would defend yourself and your home if it came to it. It's not murder than is it. Obviously subjected to the laws of your nation.
You made no distinction. You said murder. But, war is war. There is no innocence in war, and not to those fighting it, because there is only warfare. Where the innocent can be caught up in it. They weren't aware, they weren't prepared, they need refuge. Cry me a river. Of course they are. They're also fighting or supporting it.
War is not murder, it is war. Self defense, offense, justice, gain, loss, victory, surrender.
You are under the assumption war is something else. You are trying to create an ideology for war. There is none. There is only victory, surrender, truce, or peace. Meanwhile in your hypocrisy you just supported war. As I strangely knew you would. You just said self defense. What is that, disagreeing with your enemy? Hahaha.
Yes, the innocent pay for their nations acting on it. But they're not innocent if they support the guilty. It doesn't mean kill them, I am sure it does, terms and conditions applied.
Am I condoning murder, no. I don't believe when there's peace people should be murdered unless they're guilty of murder, or such. But I am supporting war. It is a decider. A leveller. A judgment. A reaper. A service. A duty. Etc etc etc. Until any peace can come to agreeable terms and truce.
You seem to be under this other assumption you can decide what murder is? You're calling war, an attacker, a murderer. But innocently you're just the defender. Planet stupid. Hey guys I am gonna buy all these weapons to defend myself, but god forbid I get attacked with them. No, what? You just sat there while somebody else bought all those weapons to defend your home, and god forbid they get attacked because it's so unfair?