From that comment, two quotes stand out..."Another user (who I know is genuine) made the case in modmail that TallestSkil is a passionate and genuine user of this website, and asked he be unbanned on conspiracies despite his tendency to resort to telling other users to kill themselves in arguments."
and "I don't think anyone could make the case convincingly to me that TallestSkil is simply a spammer or troll who hates this website and it's users in general and is only here to troll, and as such needs to be banned outright."
So some user vouched for TallestSkil, and that apparently makes him bulletproof? The moderator is BEYOND convincing? TallestSkil says things like, "It’s cute to see all the autistic cowards come together to have a circle jerk of lies"...how is that not an attack on the users?
Same thing with the shill iknowitsu. Just recently said, "Too bad most the people here have a ridiculously low IQ." Apparently stuff like that is fine.
One can only surmise that they are alts of the mods, admin accounts, or that the mods are complicit.
If he thinks Jews are evil, why is he attacking conspiracy theorists?
Because in classic conpro shill form, everyone who disagrees with him is automatically a “jew”.
Apparently stuff like that is fine.
We can’t very well ban proud/vain delusion and stupidity. I mean, we can but there won’t be many people left here.
I can’t speak to why the mods here support or defend tallestskill. I can understand not tolerating death threats, encouraging of suicide, or general ad hominem of any kind. Helping to train such users to follow those simple rules or not be part of the discussion through banning and/or deletion of such comments is certainly arguable.
As a mod myself (not of this community of course), i personally tolerate such things because i detest censorship and support freedom of speech to a fault. My line is disingenuousness. If you are a bot, or willfully trolling - essentially only then will you be banned/silenced. In any case, if your community has rules (most of them do not - it is not straightforward to populate them in the communities.win format) they should certainly be equally apportioned.
One can only surmise that they are alts of the mods, admin accounts, or that the mods are complicit.
That would be sad. Such things do happen, and would undoubtedly be a tactic to ensure communities like this always remain “limited hangouts” and to stifle/destroy community whenever possible.
I find this likely. They very rarely stay on topic, and usually just seek to inflame/insult.
That is NOT someone interested in truth or conspiracies.
Very possibly. They claim to be very interested in their own, zealous, truth. They certainly don’t seem to be very interested in earnest discussion or research in any case - especially if it contradicts “their truth”.
Do you think if he were REALLY white and not Jewish, he would be arguing and slandering every white person on here?
If he thinks Jews are evil, why is he attacking conspiracy theorists?
And why is this done with the APPROVAL of the mods?
From that comment, two quotes stand out..."Another user (who I know is genuine) made the case in modmail that TallestSkil is a passionate and genuine user of this website, and asked he be unbanned on conspiracies despite his tendency to resort to telling other users to kill themselves in arguments."
and "I don't think anyone could make the case convincingly to me that TallestSkil is simply a spammer or troll who hates this website and it's users in general and is only here to troll, and as such needs to be banned outright."
So some user vouched for TallestSkil, and that apparently makes him bulletproof? The moderator is BEYOND convincing? TallestSkil says things like, "It’s cute to see all the autistic cowards come together to have a circle jerk of lies"...how is that not an attack on the users?
Same thing with the shill iknowitsu. Just recently said, "Too bad most the people here have a ridiculously low IQ." Apparently stuff like that is fine.
One can only surmise that they are alts of the mods, admin accounts, or that the mods are complicit.
Because in classic conpro shill form, everyone who disagrees with him is automatically a “jew”.
We can’t very well ban proud/vain delusion and stupidity. I mean, we can but there won’t be many people left here.
I can’t speak to why the mods here support or defend tallestskill. I can understand not tolerating death threats, encouraging of suicide, or general ad hominem of any kind. Helping to train such users to follow those simple rules or not be part of the discussion through banning and/or deletion of such comments is certainly arguable.
As a mod myself (not of this community of course), i personally tolerate such things because i detest censorship and support freedom of speech to a fault. My line is disingenuousness. If you are a bot, or willfully trolling - essentially only then will you be banned/silenced. In any case, if your community has rules (most of them do not - it is not straightforward to populate them in the communities.win format) they should certainly be equally apportioned.
That would be sad. Such things do happen, and would undoubtedly be a tactic to ensure communities like this always remain “limited hangouts” and to stifle/destroy community whenever possible.
That's the thing....Tallestskil IS willfully trolling.
He will scan all the threads for any mention of himself, and then immediately pounce. I caught him doing this multiple times now.
That is NOT someone interested in truth or conspiracies.
I find this likely. They very rarely stay on topic, and usually just seek to inflame/insult.
Very possibly. They claim to be very interested in their own, zealous, truth. They certainly don’t seem to be very interested in earnest discussion or research in any case - especially if it contradicts “their truth”.
And...he just replied saying I was LYING about him jumping into threads.
Which I wasn't.
Why is acceptable to the mods?
https://conspiracies.win/p/16ZX7xakKr/x/c/4TnRWx33KuS