Now those women are single in their 30’s with 1-3 kids and I can only think that is possible becus the guy just wanted to fuck, nut one off and move on. Guess everyone is your type when that person is young dumb and full of cum.
I guarantee they have sealed biomes underground, underwater, and probably on islands where they will live out their lives in an Elysium style paradise while the rest of us die off.
You're right; guarantee was a strong word. I THEORIZE that they have the advanced technology available to create a sealed biome. I'm not referring to an area where they won't be able to access materials from outside of the biome, just that they would have some kind of decontamination protocol for entering the biome. While the technology to clean up nanoplastics worldwide probably doesn't exist, I think they would have a greater chance of purifying a smaller area like a biome from toxic materials.
The Arizona experiment in the 90's ultimately failed, but we've come a long way since then technologically.
There is a way (inception towards death) for every one (living) within. All suggested narratives represents pathways to the same outcome (death); yet following them tempts one to ignore being the resistance (living) within the tempting way (process of dying).
the highest level of government
To GOVERN (control) the MENT (mind) of another doesn't require one to be at a high level; it requires the controlled mind to lower itself through ignorance of perceivable for suggested.
In short...the few seem high; because the many keep digging themselves in.
they are trying to murder most of us
a) MUR'DER, noun [Latin mors.] - "unlawfully killing". There's no unlawful within natural law.
b) ignoring perceivable (natural law) for suggested (laws of men) represents suicidal consent to genocidal orders. The few aren't murdering the many; the direct the suicidal ignorance of the many with genocidal orders through a narrated self destruction. Why the suggested narratives? To allow the many to justify their self destruction by blaming others for the suggested narratives they consent to.
c) everyone dies; most willingly ignore the response-ability (choice) to sustain life by resisting the temptation of dying, and so a few will be tempted to exploit the ignorance of the many by suggesting death (want) over life (need).
Now those women are single in their 30’s with 1-3 kids and I can only think that is possible becus the guy just wanted to fuck, nut one off and move on. Guess everyone is your type when that person is young dumb and full of cum.
I guarantee they have sealed biomes underground, underwater, and probably on islands where they will live out their lives in an Elysium style paradise while the rest of us die off.
Lol? Fun fantasy. It's like you don't know how life works.
This isn't a video game. Shit don't work like that.
For a container biome to survive. Massive inputs would be required.
This is not the solution.
You're right; guarantee was a strong word. I THEORIZE that they have the advanced technology available to create a sealed biome. I'm not referring to an area where they won't be able to access materials from outside of the biome, just that they would have some kind of decontamination protocol for entering the biome. While the technology to clean up nanoplastics worldwide probably doesn't exist, I think they would have a greater chance of purifying a smaller area like a biome from toxic materials.
The Arizona experiment in the 90's ultimately failed, but we've come a long way since then technologically.
There is a way (inception towards death) for every one (living) within. All suggested narratives represents pathways to the same outcome (death); yet following them tempts one to ignore being the resistance (living) within the tempting way (process of dying).
To GOVERN (control) the MENT (mind) of another doesn't require one to be at a high level; it requires the controlled mind to lower itself through ignorance of perceivable for suggested.
In short...the few seem high; because the many keep digging themselves in.
a) MUR'DER, noun [Latin mors.] - "unlawfully killing". There's no unlawful within natural law.
b) ignoring perceivable (natural law) for suggested (laws of men) represents suicidal consent to genocidal orders. The few aren't murdering the many; the direct the suicidal ignorance of the many with genocidal orders through a narrated self destruction. Why the suggested narratives? To allow the many to justify their self destruction by blaming others for the suggested narratives they consent to.
c) everyone dies; most willingly ignore the response-ability (choice) to sustain life by resisting the temptation of dying, and so a few will be tempted to exploit the ignorance of the many by suggesting death (want) over life (need).