The fact that your "theory" can't explain even basic phenomenon means it's garbage.
I gave you a simple, geometric hypothetical, no "science" required: what path, on FE, does the sun take that matches the universal observation that it rises in the East in every location at all times of the year? Again: dinner plate/meatball level of difficulty.
I can show exactly how this works in the heliocentric model in 5 seconds.
Everyone can see the sun, and that it rises in the East; your "lasers" exist only in grainy video and prove nothing.
it spins closer. then spins farther away. these are the equinoxes.
where it crosses over during its spin cycle twice a year in the middle is the equator.
this is the path the sun takes.
and the dome above rotates.
and this matches what you refer to as the "universal observation"
try it yourself.
put your phone down in the middle of the room
walk around it clockwise
you just now "circumnavigated" your phone
does this mean your room is curved? no.
does this mean your house is a sphere? no.
if your ego can handle this simple experiment
and seriously reflect on its implications..
maybe.. just maybe...
you will have a paradigm shift in your mind
and see this simple truth
that is a complex lie.
you can't show anyone the heliocentric model in 2 minutes.
That's you childishly boosting.
yet, I can show you in 2 minutes the North Star that has not moved since maps were made period.
it has remained fixed so much so that an Astrolab made a thousand years ago is still valid and works this very day and was based on a flat earth map model made by the same inventor.
He showed people where shit was and taught them how to use the stars to get there by land or sea.
so a sidereal degree is 72 years surely in a man's lifetime you would see it move half a degree. has it? no. can your grandfather see a change? no.
well after 1000 years that 13.8 degrees that the map and Astrolab would be off.
but it's not.
even Einstein himself could not devise a mechanism to measure the "earth's" movement.
you've never felt the earth move unless you've been in an earthquake.
when the earth "rotates daily", you do not feel as though you're being pushed or pulled by the "earth's mass" that is being "pulled" by the sun's "gravity"...
we all feel no change.
think about what you've been taught. really think about it.
the electrostatic weak charge is a million times stronger than this thing called gravity that can't be measured or quantified by science.
they've never found a graviton and they won't. its a red herring.
and now in this day and age of the twenty-first century...
your phone is 10000x better than the Apollo pc.
you got more tech in your hand than the "astronauts" did.
and they supposedly made it in 10 years of trying.
and then no one has been higher than 300 miles "since" 1972.
That's 50 years.
65 million a day now is NASA's budget.
every globe has a sticker that says "not for instructional purpose"
anyways there is a simple experiment you can do to prove there is no relation to a sphere or "globe" or anything to do with curvature when circumnavigating.
what this means is explorers like Ferdinand Magellan and Capt Cook all went around the north (electromagnetic center) pole and used the North star to keep a heading to the right when traveling east and the left when traveling west...
on a circle. not a sphere.
well right on, there are some concepts you can ponder...
The fact that your "theory" can't explain even basic phenomenon means it's garbage.
I gave you a simple, geometric hypothetical, no "science" required: what path, on FE, does the sun take that matches the universal observation that it rises in the East in every location at all times of the year? Again: dinner plate/meatball level of difficulty.
I can show exactly how this works in the heliocentric model in 5 seconds.
Everyone can see the sun, and that it rises in the East; your "lasers" exist only in grainy video and prove nothing.
the sun circumnavigates the north pole.
it spins closer. then spins farther away. these are the equinoxes.
where it crosses over during its spin cycle twice a year in the middle is the equator.
this is the path the sun takes.
and the dome above rotates.
and this matches what you refer to as the "universal observation"
try it yourself.
put your phone down in the middle of the room
walk around it clockwise
you just now "circumnavigated" your phone
does this mean your room is curved? no.
does this mean your house is a sphere? no.
if your ego can handle this simple experiment
and seriously reflect on its implications..
maybe.. just maybe...
you will have a paradigm shift in your mind
and see this simple truth
that is a complex lie.
you can't show anyone the heliocentric model in 2 minutes.
That's you childishly boosting.
yet, I can show you in 2 minutes the North Star that has not moved since maps were made period.
it has remained fixed so much so that an Astrolab made a thousand years ago is still valid and works this very day and was based on a flat earth map model made by the same inventor.
He showed people where shit was and taught them how to use the stars to get there by land or sea.
so a sidereal degree is 72 years surely in a man's lifetime you would see it move half a degree. has it? no. can your grandfather see a change? no.
well after 1000 years that 13.8 degrees that the map and Astrolab would be off.
but it's not.
even Einstein himself could not devise a mechanism to measure the "earth's" movement.
you've never felt the earth move unless you've been in an earthquake.
when the earth "rotates daily", you do not feel as though you're being pushed or pulled by the "earth's mass" that is being "pulled" by the sun's "gravity"...
we all feel no change.
think about what you've been taught. really think about it.
the electrostatic weak charge is a million times stronger than this thing called gravity that can't be measured or quantified by science.
they've never found a graviton and they won't. its a red herring.
and now in this day and age of the twenty-first century...
your phone is 10000x better than the Apollo pc.
you got more tech in your hand than the "astronauts" did.
and they supposedly made it in 10 years of trying.
and then no one has been higher than 300 miles "since" 1972.
That's 50 years.
65 million a day now is NASA's budget.
every globe has a sticker that says "not for instructional purpose"
anyways there is a simple experiment you can do to prove there is no relation to a sphere or "globe" or anything to do with curvature when circumnavigating.
what this means is explorers like Ferdinand Magellan and Capt Cook all went around the north (electromagnetic center) pole and used the North star to keep a heading to the right when traveling east and the left when traveling west...
on a circle. not a sphere.
well right on, there are some concepts you can ponder...