I guess perhaps it brings this "faint line" indicator to question as possibly introducing subjectivity into a test. One doctor would conclude a very faint line to be negative whereas another doctor could mark it as positive to increase the hospital government reimbursement revenue.
I'm not sure this really proves much.
I guess perhaps it brings this "faint line" indicator to question as possibly introducing subjectivity into a test. One doctor would conclude a very faint line to be negative whereas another doctor could mark it as positive to increase the hospital government reimbursement revenue.