a) to remember represents responding to memorized information aka ignoring that which is for memories about that which isn't anymore.
b) there can only be one time (process of dying) for ones duration (living) within aka the same time for each different duration.
actually knew etymology
ACT'UAL, adjective - "existing in act"
ETYMOL'OGY, noun - "that part of philology which explains the origin and derivation of words"
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
a) every reaction (living) exists within enacting (process of dying). Partial (perceiving) can only exist within whole (perceivable).
b) the origin for every suggested word represents perceivable sound and -OLOGY implies a branch of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, hence indicating a belief system (scientism).
c) suggested etymology tempts one to ignore perceivable sound, and consenting to anything suggested implies dissonance (want) over resonance (need) within the source of perceivable sound.
look like a retard
RET'ARD, verb [Latin retardo; re and tardo, to delay, tardus, slow, late.] - "to diminish the velocity of motion".
Resistance (living) cannot perceive the diminishing of the velocity of motion (process of dying) without ceasing to exist as the resistance within the momentum of velocity.
made you look like
How could a suggested word make the perceivable shape of another look like something; without your consent to believe the suggested (fiction) over the perceivable (reality)?
i remember that one time someone that actually knew etymology made you look like the retard you are
a) to remember represents responding to memorized information aka ignoring that which is for memories about that which isn't anymore.
b) there can only be one time (process of dying) for ones duration (living) within aka the same time for each different duration.
a) every reaction (living) exists within enacting (process of dying). Partial (perceiving) can only exist within whole (perceivable).
b) the origin for every suggested word represents perceivable sound and -OLOGY implies a branch of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, hence indicating a belief system (scientism).
c) suggested etymology tempts one to ignore perceivable sound, and consenting to anything suggested implies dissonance (want) over resonance (need) within the source of perceivable sound.
Resistance (living) cannot perceive the diminishing of the velocity of motion (process of dying) without ceasing to exist as the resistance within the momentum of velocity.
How could a suggested word make the perceivable shape of another look like something; without your consent to believe the suggested (fiction) over the perceivable (reality)?
didnt read lmao
Your free will of choice...
...yet still responding with emotions evoked by the choices of others.
u got me m8 good job, now keep doing this in like literally every thread, enjoy wasting your life.
i seriously hope your a bot and not an actual person that wastes so much time doing this.