The fallacy is your belief that the government is legitimately doing anything to actually reduce global temperatures. For one thing, they would have to REDUCE GDP, not expand it. And since their own government spending increases consumption and energy usage, they would have to cut back on the size of government and government spending. Do they do that? Of course not. And in order to increase tax revenue, they must promote more economic activity and commerce and profits to tax. This increases energy usage since economic activity requires energy usage. Politicians frequently fly in private jets and burn thousands of gallons of jet fuel. Politicians utilize large amounts of electricity. The government buildings are very inefficient and utilize millions of dollars worth of electricity and energy maintaining and operating these huge government buildings housing thousands and thousands of lazy, inefficient, overpaid bureaucrats. Does that sound like GREEN policy to you?
You should start a thread about the ancient esoteric knowledge and belief and possible existence of dragons. Sounds like a cool subject.
These animal spirits or bloodlines reminds me of Native American theory in which young boys and girls were assigned nicknames tying them to animal spirits. Sitting Bull. Crazy Horse.
I think you are taking my comment about authoritarian reptilian demons ruling over us and terraforming the planet too seriously.
For hypothetical purposes, you could force people to be more "green" conscious by simply halting all garbage collection and disposal. When people's garbage starts piling up, they will be more conscience of how much waste they produce.
As far as climate change, I think I linked you to declassified evidence that government is indeed involved in geo-engineering aka climate change operations. They create the problem for which they advertise themselves as being the problem solvers for.
No logical fallacy. Because the globalists always accuse the populace of what they themselves are doing.
If the globalists are accusing you of warming the earth, it's because they are the ones doing it.
Government Admits Geo-Engineering/Weather-Controlling Projects Are Live https://ugetube.com/watch/government-admits-geo-engineering-weather-controlling-projects-are-live_dZAiKor3zMfG7fE.html
With Operation Popeye, the U.S. government made weather an instrument of war As geo-engineering projects soar, the declassified project is newly relevant. https://www.popsci.com/operation-popeye-government-weather-vietnam-war/
Government Quietly Admits Weather Modification https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/government-quietly-admits-weather-modification/
Research HAARP
The fallacy is your belief that the government is legitimately doing anything to actually reduce global temperatures. For one thing, they would have to REDUCE GDP, not expand it. And since their own government spending increases consumption and energy usage, they would have to cut back on the size of government and government spending. Do they do that? Of course not. And in order to increase tax revenue, they must promote more economic activity and commerce and profits to tax. This increases energy usage since economic activity requires energy usage. Politicians frequently fly in private jets and burn thousands of gallons of jet fuel. Politicians utilize large amounts of electricity. The government buildings are very inefficient and utilize millions of dollars worth of electricity and energy maintaining and operating these huge government buildings housing thousands and thousands of lazy, inefficient, overpaid bureaucrats. Does that sound like GREEN policy to you?
You should start a thread about the ancient esoteric knowledge and belief and possible existence of dragons. Sounds like a cool subject.
These animal spirits or bloodlines reminds me of Native American theory in which young boys and girls were assigned nicknames tying them to animal spirits. Sitting Bull. Crazy Horse.
I think you are taking my comment about authoritarian reptilian demons ruling over us and terraforming the planet too seriously.
For hypothetical purposes, you could force people to be more "green" conscious by simply halting all garbage collection and disposal. When people's garbage starts piling up, they will be more conscience of how much waste they produce.
As far as climate change, I think I linked you to declassified evidence that government is indeed involved in geo-engineering aka climate change operations. They create the problem for which they advertise themselves as being the problem solvers for.