Consenting to suggested information devaluates the perceiving choice to evaluate perceivable inspiration (value).
Eva is being tempted to evaluate the values suggested by others; which gives those others the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested values; which in return devalues Eva and everyone consenting to her suggested evaluations perpetuating the temptation.
humans are simple creatures
a) HUMANS (heb. form) represent SIMPLE (uncompounded) reactions (living) within COMPLEX (compounded) action (process of dying).
b) creationism (out of nothing) is being suggested to tempt the partial (simple) to ignore the perceivable whole (complex) aka the whole which transmutes (out of everything) everyone within.
speaking these truths
a) to speak implies tempting others to ignore perceivable (sound) for suggested (words).
b) to suggest definitions (true or false) tempts one to ignore the predefined (perceivable change).
our side
a) you just proclaimed humans to be simple (uncompounded); which you now contradict with suggesting "our" (compounded). One (singular) cannot be our (plural) unless ignoring perceivable reality (apartheid) for suggested fiction (sameness).
b) choosing a suggested side (want vs not want) implies being choice at the "center" of perceivable balance (need/want). You don't need to choose a side; you need to resist the temptation to want to choose a side.
men fight for something
a) to fight implies consenting to suggested conflict against others; which ignores the perceivable struggle of resisting (living) temptation (dying), which just so happens to represent the struggle of each ones choice within perceivable balance, so not against others; but for the sustenance of self.
b) offense (process of dying) generates defense (living)...
c) "for something" represents the suggested fiction others are utilizing to tempt one into conflicts aka for victory; for glory; for the fatherland; for the motherland; for redemption; for freedom; for liberty; for valhalla; for paradise; for heaven; for justice etc...anything as long as it aims forwards (progressivism) because that's where the process of dying processes the living towards.
So while the many are busy dying for "something"; the few parasitically scoop up "everything" the many willingly ignore.
Consenting to suggested information devaluates the perceiving choice to evaluate perceivable inspiration (value).
Eva is being tempted to evaluate the values suggested by others; which gives those others the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested values; which in return devalues Eva and everyone consenting to her suggested evaluations perpetuating the temptation.
a) HUMANS (heb. form) represent SIMPLE (uncompounded) reactions (living) within COMPLEX (compounded) action (process of dying).
b) creationism (out of nothing) is being suggested to tempt the partial (simple) to ignore the perceivable whole (complex) aka the whole which transmutes (out of everything) everyone within.
a) to speak implies tempting others to ignore perceivable (sound) for suggested (words).
b) to suggest definitions (true or false) tempts one to ignore the predefined (perceivable change).
a) you just proclaimed humans to be simple (uncompounded); which you now contradict with suggesting "our" (compounded). One (singular) cannot be our (plural) unless ignoring perceivable reality (apartheid) for suggested fiction (sameness).
b) choosing a suggested side (want vs not want) implies being choice at the "center" of perceivable balance (need/want). You don't need to choose a side; you need to resist the temptation to want to choose a side.
a) to fight implies consenting to suggested conflict against others; which ignores the perceivable struggle of resisting (living) temptation (dying), which just so happens to represent the struggle of each ones choice within perceivable balance, so not against others; but for the sustenance of self.
b) offense (process of dying) generates defense (living)...
c) "for something" represents the suggested fiction others are utilizing to tempt one into conflicts aka for victory; for glory; for the fatherland; for the motherland; for redemption; for freedom; for liberty; for valhalla; for paradise; for heaven; for justice etc...anything as long as it aims forwards (progressivism) because that's where the process of dying processes the living towards.
So while the many are busy dying for "something"; the few parasitically scoop up "everything" the many willingly ignore.
Is eva a trap as well?