For example, if you take a moment in time nearly anywhere along the timeline, I suspect you will discover many similarities in many facets.
Let's start with the loss of stone craftsmanship. We have easily forgotten more than we know. But what we do know is relevant for the time era.
The same can be said about many things, as the respected tools of the age whither and die, often the people watching that unfold would also broadcast your predictions.
We have never scaled this large to our knowledge/evidence. So, a collapse is likely always occurring at this threshold. Somewhere..
Remember rock and roll is just a fad. That basic instinct and preference for the known is what keeps us in the trench. Generally someone escapes the trench and leads the new way periodically.
I think we been in this trench for a long while now and it is time to move on, We are simply as a group waiting for the next leap, which one will it be? which direction?
The suggestion is that we can expect a leap, your mind assumes this is a leap forward I suspect. In reality this is generally the outcome, people usually show great resistance to back peddling.
However, there have been at least a few cases where societal shifts appear in retrograde.
Sure, they have no will / desire or whatever, but this is not how it works, we are not led by them nor their thoughts. We are led by leaders and people who make moves.
So generally once the group moves, the group moves. These people can be trained can be directed and can be led, it is why we/they are here.
So, essentially with so many misled we can understand the increasing opportunity for a better leader.
These are just measurements we have taken and reports we have produced, should be taken with a grain of salt, it is like measuring dicks globally.
I would suggest that the possibility of any decline can be met with scientific approaches, using genome adjustments and clones.
I think we cannot easily predict the trajectory, I do not think anything can really stop us completely, even a micro nova will only affect a portion of the planet for a period.
If all things align we can maybe see an earth level event prior to gaining technology to leave the planet, no way to be sure. Our pace is not easily measured.
I think we have grown too large to be properly manageable and need to reduce sizes into manageable areas. Even states may be too large now, as for example California is simply too large and complex to manage - it is now like a country of its own - now claimed as 4th largest world economy!? Bigger than Britain and Germany!? and it needs to become several smaller microstates'. At minimum Nor Cal and So Cal but also Central Cal, and Nor Cal needs to split into Eastern Northern California and Bay Area/Northern Coast.
A second concern is that corporations have grown too large and in some cases are larger than parts of government. When an organization is too big, it can be unmanageable because the complications are just too much to understand and manage. Some of that is because the ripple effects of decisions may be hard to predict and it is easy to make expensive mistakes. Also, 'too big to fail' is a really bad thing, and when it happens you get bailouts that damage the economy. That should never be allowed to take place.
I think that when things get too big, failure is inevitable. Our greatest enemy is not The Great Reset but rather, uncontrolled growth beyond sustainability. Imagine an amoeba that eats everything, grows to mountain size, and it reaches a state where it cannot sustain itself because it has destroyed everything around it.
I don't know. I think this is too simple.
For example, if you take a moment in time nearly anywhere along the timeline, I suspect you will discover many similarities in many facets.
Let's start with the loss of stone craftsmanship. We have easily forgotten more than we know. But what we do know is relevant for the time era.
The same can be said about many things, as the respected tools of the age whither and die, often the people watching that unfold would also broadcast your predictions.
We have never scaled this large to our knowledge/evidence. So, a collapse is likely always occurring at this threshold. Somewhere..
Remember rock and roll is just a fad. That basic instinct and preference for the known is what keeps us in the trench. Generally someone escapes the trench and leads the new way periodically.
I think we been in this trench for a long while now and it is time to move on, We are simply as a group waiting for the next leap, which one will it be? which direction?
I see no such implication.
The suggestion is that we can expect a leap, your mind assumes this is a leap forward I suspect. In reality this is generally the outcome, people usually show great resistance to back peddling.
However, there have been at least a few cases where societal shifts appear in retrograde.
Well, again. Not really convinced.
Sure, they have no will / desire or whatever, but this is not how it works, we are not led by them nor their thoughts. We are led by leaders and people who make moves.
So generally once the group moves, the group moves. These people can be trained can be directed and can be led, it is why we/they are here.
So, essentially with so many misled we can understand the increasing opportunity for a better leader.
Perhaps.
These are just measurements we have taken and reports we have produced, should be taken with a grain of salt, it is like measuring dicks globally.
I would suggest that the possibility of any decline can be met with scientific approaches, using genome adjustments and clones.
I think we cannot easily predict the trajectory, I do not think anything can really stop us completely, even a micro nova will only affect a portion of the planet for a period.
If all things align we can maybe see an earth level event prior to gaining technology to leave the planet, no way to be sure. Our pace is not easily measured.
Necessity is the mother of invention.
I 100% agree with this.
I think we have grown too large to be properly manageable and need to reduce sizes into manageable areas. Even states may be too large now, as for example California is simply too large and complex to manage - it is now like a country of its own - now claimed as 4th largest world economy!? Bigger than Britain and Germany!? and it needs to become several smaller microstates'. At minimum Nor Cal and So Cal but also Central Cal, and Nor Cal needs to split into Eastern Northern California and Bay Area/Northern Coast.
A second concern is that corporations have grown too large and in some cases are larger than parts of government. When an organization is too big, it can be unmanageable because the complications are just too much to understand and manage. Some of that is because the ripple effects of decisions may be hard to predict and it is easy to make expensive mistakes. Also, 'too big to fail' is a really bad thing, and when it happens you get bailouts that damage the economy. That should never be allowed to take place.
I think that when things get too big, failure is inevitable. Our greatest enemy is not The Great Reset but rather, uncontrolled growth beyond sustainability. Imagine an amoeba that eats everything, grows to mountain size, and it reaches a state where it cannot sustain itself because it has destroyed everything around it.