One obvious form of this is the media.

a) If each one exists as the perceiving one (partial) at the center of everything perceivable (whole); then the suggestions of others tempt one off center...hence being called MEDIA; ME'DIATE, adjective [Latin medius, middle.] - "Interposed; intervening"

b) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) doesn't represent OB'VIOUS, adjective [Latin obvus.] - "meeting", but apartheid aka different partials (living) within same whole (process of dying).

The power of suggestion and repetition

a) The power of partial (living) within whole (process of dying) implies being resistance (form) within the momentum (balance) of velocity (flow).

b) the center of momentum (balance) implies free will of choice.

c) form (life) within the momentum (resistance/temptation) of flow (inception towards death) implies constant adaptation to being moved; hence free will of choice representing FRE'QUENCY, noun - "occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals"

d) the few first invert perceivable (inspiration) with suggested (information), and after gaining consent by the many, they mimic frequency of repetition through suggested information 24/7 (media; enter-tame-mind; tell-a-vision; govern (to control) ment (mind; memory) etc.)

Just look at the last 3 years.

That represents the many perpetuating suggestion among themselves aka ignoring that which is (perceivable inspiration) for that which was (suggested information).

Suggested "3 years ago" doesn't exit now, only the ever changing moment(um) of motion exists now for the perceiving partials within the perceivable whole.

Tel a vision to channel a program on to the viewer.

a) telling a vision represents suggested information over perceivable inspiration.

b) inception towards death represents the "channel" for the life within, which communicates itself as moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation.

c) the few suggest artificial channels of information to tempt the many to ignore the only natural channel of perceivable inspiration.

d) consenting to suggested over perceivable represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; hence the submission of choice to choice aka the shirking of response-ability (choice) within a balance based system (momentum).

Those who consent to suggested are being programmed to follow suggested orders; while ignoring to resist the perceivable natural order.

e) those without eyes to see "view" perceivable reality through the lens of suggested fiction; hence ignoring perceivable inspiration for suggested information.

The main deception represents the suggested word over the perceivable sound...the few suggest "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound.

Nature doesn't brand itself; no information is being suggested by it, instead...nature self segregates (whole into partial); which those within perceivable (whole) perceive as moving differences (partials) aka inspiration to adapt to the struggle of self sustenance for temporary apartheid (living) within ongoing sameness (process of dying).