Dude, sorry to disappoint but this is anothing nothing burger.
This is the official Pharmacovigilance (and regulatory) body in Japan. Basically we can all form a conspiracies.win pharmacovigilance institute and do our own analysis but like whatever...
once I see the analysis accepted in a peer-reviewed journal I will retract my comments. And , yes I know the counterarguments here so please do not even bother. We are on the same side
in a proper study you take a non vaccinated cohort (simply a group of people) expose them to an intervention (in this case covid) and calculate the incidence of mariocarditis.
you then take another cohort, let's say vaccinated cohort, and expose them to the same intervention (in this case covid) and calculate the risk of mariocarditis (not a typo).
You can then calculate the odds ratio or simply put odds of getting mariocarditis from been exposed to the agent.
Now if the agent does not exist (enter the Cohoax magical entity) how can you run the study?
Your odds remain 1:1,000,000 if you don’t get the shot. Why point the gun at your heart?
Also, 4:1M on each dose? 8:1M after the second? Which dose are you on? My coworkers are getting their fifth shot. That puts them at 16:1M or 20:1M depending how you calculate the odds. I’m still at 1:1M. Meanwhile they are in the 1:62,000 camp.
And those odds are a vast understatement. Germany estimated it was more like 1:5,000 for the first shot. That’s 200 in 1,000,000.
Dude, sorry to disappoint but this is anothing nothing burger.
This is the official Pharmacovigilance (and regulatory) body in Japan. Basically we can all form a conspiracies.win pharmacovigilance institute and do our own analysis but like whatever...
once I see the analysis accepted in a peer-reviewed journal I will retract my comments. And , yes I know the counterarguments here so please do not even bother. We are on the same side
It is all nothing burger. There is no valid eureka coming. Just more humm and buzz to keep the fires burning.
If the risk of myocarditis is 1 in 1,000,000.
Now the risk is 4 in 1,000,000.
Still not bad odds.
this is not how odds are calculated
in a proper study you take a non vaccinated cohort (simply a group of people) expose them to an intervention (in this case covid) and calculate the incidence of mariocarditis. you then take another cohort, let's say vaccinated cohort, and expose them to the same intervention (in this case covid) and calculate the risk of mariocarditis (not a typo).
You can then calculate the odds ratio or simply put odds of getting mariocarditis from been exposed to the agent.
Now if the agent does not exist (enter the Cohoax magical entity) how can you run the study?
Enjoy the $cience.
38 cases in 99,834,543 as published in the article, still is mighty fine odds.
I am not sure you understood what I wrote but in case let us know exactly how you came into this conclusion
I don't care what you wrote, it's always subversive.
I was commenting about the numbers in the article.
yea so how did you derive the numbers...
Those are not the odds.
38 cases in 99,834,543
more bullshit from your anus
It's from the article YOU posted.
Your odds remain 1:1,000,000 if you don’t get the shot. Why point the gun at your heart?
Also, 4:1M on each dose? 8:1M after the second? Which dose are you on? My coworkers are getting their fifth shot. That puts them at 16:1M or 20:1M depending how you calculate the odds. I’m still at 1:1M. Meanwhile they are in the 1:62,000 camp.
And those odds are a vast understatement. Germany estimated it was more like 1:5,000 for the first shot. That’s 200 in 1,000,000.
Friends don’t let friends play Russian roulette.