Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

16
Biden Admin Weighs Blocking Twitter Deal On "National Security" Grounds... (www.zerohedge.com)
posted 3 years ago by dukey 3 years ago by dukey +16 / -0
10 comments share
10 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (10)
sorted by:
▲ 12 ▼
– dukey [S] 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

If it wasn't already obvious that twitter is basically a government entity this should solidify it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– NigaroFagetsu-kun 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

For the last 100-or-so years the US government has been this planet's largest purveyor of misinformation, disinformation, lies, and propaganda. Twatter is the major outlet for their psyop bullshittery now, and without it, the "intelligence community's" army of bots, subversives, and zionist stooges would actually have to put effort into eroding the foundations of western civilization.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Ep0ch 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1

But he can't and technically not by law. An empty gesture.

Laughable press. Causality

Twitter sues Musks for not buying. Potus blocks Musk buying Twitter. Hang on why was any case to Musk for not buying Twitter put forward to trial. Umm Potus thinks he owns something he doesn't. Technically the Potus might be able to claim some authority, citing some other grounds like national security. However it causes Twitter to become completely redundant. It would tank overnight. Potus blocks Twitter. Not happening.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– PPGfrog 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Then how did they break up, "Ma Bell"? This is what Congress is for. The only thing in fact. Regulating interstate commerce because it happens outside a states level. If I remember correctly the broke this by mandating seat belts because cars go state to state. Then it all went to hell in a hand-basket.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

Congress can, they regulate it. What it can broadcast, content, and dumber laws of cannot say this or that. President not without specific clause. He can seize it under certain powers. Then it's mostly offline. There are also certain powers blocking mergers if a threat, or blocking mergers under the monopoly act. Unlikely he was being sued for not buying it. Again what happens to it.

But who in Congress is stopping it. They aren't. If the Potus does. If that happens. No more twitter. It tanks into oblivion.

The government doesn't own it either. If they attempted too. No more Twitter.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– PPGfrog 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

I doubt Brandon dove the sea and blew up the pipeline either. I dont mean to be an ass, but I am sure they can block the purchase if they want to. If its not all theater in the first place. Musk is a billionaire with many huge government contracts. He didnt get there by causing problems.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Ep0ch 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

They can by lawful means. Monopoly act, or like China or hostile actors are doing shit. Or sometimes other bullshit. Like I know, let's switch off the Internet.

However the courts get involved. Because it is a public source not a government one. Government provides certain legislation, content and broadcast, but it has to be passed into a bill to become law, cannot say lynch otherwise you're banned from twitter. But what happens to it, when they do, if blocked who is gonna touch afterwards?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– PPGfrog 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

I dont know bud, there is another thread on here today about a voter fraud case being dropped because the courts dont have jurisdiction. I am convinced they will do what they are told. But we will see.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

Hmm. It's not that simple. It has to be a bill. Or executive order. Bill is passed into law. Then the courts etc. Executive order can be challenged by the courts. It isn't law until it becomes a Bill. There are certain mandates outside of this allowing seizure and foreclosure, but they often have to become validated by Congress or the Courts, unless mandated under powers of various acts, but the Supreme Court can still declare it unconstitutional.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– deleted -1 points 3 years ago +1 / -2

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy