Bad logic, which makes it worse for a materialist and a positivist. Witness testimony is evidence. No competent historian would say otherwise. Nobody says that, say, the Battle of Gettyburg didn't happen because all the living witnesses are dead.
Now, the original question was demons. Let's debate that, rather than something else, because you're being willingly obtuse, and think snark is logic.
This may be difficult for a materialist to understand, but there are things in this universe that are immaterial, or that exist in such a way as they are dualistic with energy.
Your consciousness, for example, is both a material product of your body, but your "will" is something entirely unmeasurable and at this point, unknowable. Likewise, we think we know black holes exist in space only because see their absence, so to speak.
Now, as a Christian man, being told that I'm playing Jewish games, while writing about Christian theology, your retorts and "evidence" are an attempt to redefine the terms of the debate, which, might I add, is a Jew move in an of itself. So stick with the question. What is the definition of a demon?
Bad logic, which makes it worse for a materialist and a positivist. Witness testimony is evidence. No competent historian would say otherwise. Nobody says that, say, the Battle of Gettyburg didn't happen because all the living witnesses are dead.
Now, the original question was demons. Let's debate that, rather than something else, because you're being willingly obtuse, and think snark is logic.
What is the definition of a demon?
Are you capable of answering a simple question? What is the definition of a demon?
This may be difficult for a materialist to understand, but there are things in this universe that are immaterial, or that exist in such a way as they are dualistic with energy.
Your consciousness, for example, is both a material product of your body, but your "will" is something entirely unmeasurable and at this point, unknowable. Likewise, we think we know black holes exist in space only because see their absence, so to speak.
Now, as a Christian man, being told that I'm playing Jewish games, while writing about Christian theology, your retorts and "evidence" are an attempt to redefine the terms of the debate, which, might I add, is a Jew move in an of itself. So stick with the question. What is the definition of a demon?