abject evil

What if consenting to want (good) or not want (evil) suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, implies AB'JECT, adjective [Latin abjectus) - "to throw away, sunk to a low condition; low in estimation, without regard"?

Do the living respond in regard to the perceivable process of dying when reasoning (want vs not want) about suggested...or are they being tempted to ignore perceivable for suggested?

Notice also that the few suggest a definition; redefine it and contradict it for the many who consent to want or not want it...are the few really trying to communicate something or are they suggesting miscommunication to disrupt real communication between perceiving (partial) and perceivable (whole)?