Hard to tell sometimes if Revelation is playing out or if they are trying to emulate parts of Revelation (as Bill Cooper would say).
As a lot of their NWO plans are sort of Dispensational which aren't exactly Biblical as much of NT prophecy already happened in 70AD as partial-preterists would point out (God rejecting them by destroying their white-washed tomb of a temple), something Zionists want us to forget about and think it all future, so they set up their kabbalist talmudic end times NWO scheme to make Christians think "oh, we need to support this third temple that's a part of prophecy, it has to happen! Muh red heifers!"
There still is a final end times, but much of the "end of the age" like in Matthew 24 is talking about 70AD. Hard sometimes to figure exactly where that line is drawn as some verses are talking about the second coming/Parousia/Day of the Lord.
There's also the debate if there's simply a spirit of antichrist that's always here, or if there will also be an actual person. Really debatable. Probably Alexandra did a video on that debate.
I tend to think things are going to get very rough before Christ returns, it's hard for me to imagine postmil being true where much of the world is converted (Andrew Torba probably leans towards this, I certainly hope it's true, just doubt it), I tend to be a bit more of a pessimistic amil, especially rejecting Dispensationalism as a Rothschild-funded Scofield Zionist psyop (although historic premil is possible, but most of the early church eventually went with amil).
It's a paradox. Simple causality. Revelations simply describes, seige warfare. Sacking of the once great city states and kingdoms they once ruled from. It hasn't changed metaphorically. Despite being figuratively reworded and reconstructed.
What visions did he see from those caves, calling on the gods of his exile in his stoicism, none I daresay. Simple coursework, and a team of monks, yes yes it has happened endlessly, timelessly, because it is always set to befall the faithful. You have a two tier system of godly versus the ungodly. Easier controlling the godly causing the ungodly too, and so sets a motion of it repeating endlessly. Because there will always be the religion we have bestowed, and it always draws the eire of hell. Every enemy so named. Their gods are not our gods. They are savages and demons.
It could be any sacking, ending, and collapse of civilization. The devoted, the godly, against the unbeliever, and enemy. It is doomed to repeat, give it some clause to win, got to draw the patriotism and believers foremost providing them their valor. Until in their decadence and decline they fail, but belief must not fail us. Despite the faithful crushed on the distant battlefield, versus the spawn of hell seiging the faithful's last bastions. Until there is respite, despite of the constant loss, a seige to the faithful seeking salvation, and the religion bestowed on them. It cannot forget, so it will always be a fortress, seiged, until a second coming reinforces its will, less it is completely forgotten and sacked by hell. The design is both simplimistic and eternal.
Jerusalem, Alexandria, Babylon specifically before, where it all constantly repeats itself from, it has been relayered, from so many of those manuscripts, at least he had a few left in those caves like the illiads of Troy, Rome again, Constantinople. Etc etc. Imagine what they thought of their enemies and why they fought, and what gods and virtues they held. How their belief simply reminisced.
A paradox. Where the scripture becomes the ironclad armor providing religion and victory to their believers, until as always its bastions become a metaphor for any revelations.
If you believe it you apply it. No other reason to forget it.
If there is another cosmic design, it was only regret. The city fell and had to be saved by its savior,, when it failed, because belief was all but lost in the destruction ripping it out and removing it. This narrative has been cemented into the paradigm of Christ. Hell it was Promethus.
Hard to tell sometimes if Revelation is playing out or if they are trying to emulate parts of Revelation (as Bill Cooper would say).
As a lot of their NWO plans are sort of Dispensational which aren't exactly Biblical as much of NT prophecy already happened in 70AD as partial-preterists would point out (God rejecting them by destroying their white-washed tomb of a temple), something Zionists want us to forget about and think it all future, so they set up their kabbalist talmudic end times NWO scheme to make Christians think "oh, we need to support this third temple that's a part of prophecy, it has to happen! Muh red heifers!"
There still is a final end times, but much of the "end of the age" like in Matthew 24 is talking about 70AD. Hard sometimes to figure exactly where that line is drawn as some verses are talking about the second coming/Parousia/Day of the Lord.
There's also the debate if there's simply a spirit of antichrist that's always here, or if there will also be an actual person. Really debatable. Probably Alexandra did a video on that debate.
I think about this one a lot.
I tend to think things are going to get very rough before Christ returns, it's hard for me to imagine postmil being true where much of the world is converted (Andrew Torba probably leans towards this, I certainly hope it's true, just doubt it), I tend to be a bit more of a pessimistic amil, especially rejecting Dispensationalism as a Rothschild-funded Scofield Zionist psyop (although historic premil is possible, but most of the early church eventually went with amil).
It's a paradox. Simple causality. Revelations simply describes, seige warfare. Sacking of the once great city states and kingdoms they once ruled from. It hasn't changed metaphorically. Despite being figuratively reworded and reconstructed.
What visions did he see from those caves, calling on the gods of his exile in his stoicism, none I daresay. Simple coursework, and a team of monks, yes yes it has happened endlessly, timelessly, because it is always set to befall the faithful. You have a two tier system of godly versus the ungodly. Easier controlling the godly causing the ungodly too, and so sets a motion of it repeating endlessly. Because there will always be the religion we have bestowed, and it always draws the eire of hell. Every enemy so named. Their gods are not our gods. They are savages and demons.
It could be any sacking, ending, and collapse of civilization. The devoted, the godly, against the unbeliever, and enemy. It is doomed to repeat, give it some clause to win, got to draw the patriotism and believers foremost providing them their valor. Until in their decadence and decline they fail, but belief must not fail us. Despite the faithful crushed on the distant battlefield, versus the spawn of hell seiging the faithful's last bastions. Until there is respite, despite of the constant loss, a seige to the faithful seeking salvation, and the religion bestowed on them. It cannot forget, so it will always be a fortress, seiged, until a second coming reinforces its will, less it is completely forgotten and sacked by hell. The design is both simplimistic and eternal.
Jerusalem, Alexandria, Babylon specifically before, where it all constantly repeats itself from, it has been relayered, from so many of those manuscripts, at least he had a few left in those caves like the illiads of Troy, Rome again, Constantinople. Etc etc. Imagine what they thought of their enemies and why they fought, and what gods and virtues they held. How their belief simply reminisced.
A paradox. Where the scripture becomes the ironclad armor providing religion and victory to their believers, until as always its bastions become a metaphor for any revelations.
If you believe it you apply it. No other reason to forget it.
If there is another cosmic design, it was only regret. The city fell and had to be saved by its savior,, when it failed, because belief was all but lost in the destruction ripping it out and removing it. This narrative has been cemented into the paradigm of Christ. Hell it was Promethus.