Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

4
()
posted 3 years ago by DrLeaks 3 years ago by DrLeaks +7 / -3
11 comments share
11 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (11)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Primate98 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yeah, it's fake all right, but a pretty good one as fakes go. I'll add in a couple of items to your analysis:

  • Roberts and Maxwell are both casting shadows slightly down and to the viewer's right. Andrew is casting no shadow at all, even though his should be the most plain and sharp against the white wall behind him.

  • There's black line on his belly next to Roberts, even though nothing is black in that area: his light blue shirt, her white top, the white wall.

I suppose my conclusion would be that Roberts was a limited hangout. Her accusations always seemed quite tame to me: sexual contact that was not strictly legal in the country they were in at the time.

Andrew can't admit to this, of course, but neither did he specifically say the photo was faked, which I now find a crucial point. He said he never met her, so why not just say someone faked the picture?

Well, that brings to our consciousness that "someone" exists who did the faking. We should go looking for that person, right? But that's not what They wanted. They just wanted us endlessly and pointlessly discussing what a jerk and a perv and a liar Andrew is, and how the Elites always get away with it.

And what does Maxwell's comment mean? I've long suspected that Maxwell turned state's evidence, and she knows the deeper truth about Andrew and many others.

Many would ask why she and her handlers don't just come out with it? Because the vast majority of people "can't handle the truth". Anyone disagree? Just show this picture around telling people it's fake and see how many say, "Oh yeah? You're right! Well, what do you think is going on?"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Primate98 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the link! Talking about secret messages, have you seen this one?

Larry Celona is an Anagram for Royal Lancer. The same Larry Celona from The New York Post was the first to report the death of Jeffrey Epstein, Stanley Kubrick, JFK Jr., and all the NYPD suicides. Guess who is the Colonel-in-Chief of the Royal Lancers?

(Hint: the circle is now complete!)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RachelkillsBam 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

The suicide of the CFO of BBBY was also covered by Larry Celona🤔

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 0 ▼
– DZP1 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

The 'proof' is not proof. The repudiation may be an attempt to deflect.

The 'black line' on his belly is his sharp black shadow cast from the flash on the wall behind. This cancels the claim in this thread that he cast no shadow. Look at the shadowline from his collar right edge.

The four eyes closest to the flash have pink eye, from the flash reflecting off the retina.

"when you observe straight lines in a photo, it implies human editing." That is such a bullshit assumption. Also, jpegs can easily have straight lines coming from the block compression.

The "Photoshop experts' are full of it and amateur, Internet experts.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– RentFreeCrisisAct 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

At the same time, the photo doesn't ring true. Seems photoshopped, has that "never happened" vibe. Maybe VA and Randy Andy are from the same pic, but Jizzy seems stuck in there, not really a good fit. And what, exactly, is her straight hand DOING there? Not saying it can't happen so much as it didn't. I'm starting to think Ep and Jizzy are AI created and the In N Out and all others are doctored photos. Those In N Out doctored for SURE. The reason this photo came out at all was to convince people that these scumbags like to fuck girls that are just a liiiiiiiiiitle bit illegal, like by a couple of years, but the....guy who outed Tom Hanks, his name escapes me, that weird last podcast and then he was tossed off of a bridge...he's "one of them now..." his "dead-man switch" was showing us they don't give a shit about these almost.legal girls, they like fucking TODDLERS. This whole VA Guiffe shit is a giant distraction. They want to fuck little kids. (oh yeah, Kappy!)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– deleted -1 points 3 years ago +1 / -2

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy