If all you’re going to do is repeat the same schizophrenic nonsense that has nothing to do with the topic, then we’re done.
Land “readings” are diverging from satellite data (which NASA itself says is more accurate and should be the standard instead) because over 40% of land “readings” are estimates made for places without recording equipment. To illustratively do something that the psychopaths love to do, I’ll cherrypick the last 20 years to show that there has been no warming there, despite CO2 continuing to rise. Even using just the satellite record, the world isn’t warming. If we refer back to one of the hottest years in recorded history, we see the difference. Never mind that there have only been ecological benefits to rising CO2.
It has been rising for 13,000 years. In that time, it has never risen more slowly than right now. Were our ancestors belching out CO2 faster than we were? Maybe they were farting a lot more. It’s rising more slowly than at any time in that history, and it’s also rising more slowly than any claim made public by any outlet. Here’s the source data for that chart. It’s an FTP link, so it should automatically download the raw file (which you don’t need to worry about, as it’s a bunch of undifferentiated numbers). Turns out that NOAA marks the average as 0.63 mm per year. Not 3.3. Not 2.8. Certainly not a foot per year, which is needed for the most modern public “predictions” about this bullshit.
“Okay, not ice caps, but what about the glaciers?”
They’ve been melting since at least the 1780s when we started measuring them. I also have information for the Alps and other areas. Was our pre-industrial civilization responsible for “greenhouse gases” too? There were no glaciers in Europe in the Middle Ages. That’s called the Medieval Warm Period, something your “scientists” have been trying to erase from the record for decades (ironically, since, 1984) because it goes against their narrative. Gee, we must have had even more factories then than we do now… right?
“But but but but but but but but muh consensus! They agree! Because I say they do! That makes what they say true!”
Because there is no other record of meaningful scientific value anywhere. Only the United States (and parts of Japan) has a temperature record that has been around long enough for climatological statements can be based on it. The GHCND set of stations has slowly been closed down… and what’s this! The stations being closed down ARE FAR FROM THE EQUATOR. What does that mean? The average latitude of GHCND stations IS FIFTEEN FUCKING DEGREES CLOSER TO THE EQUATOR than it used to be. Do you imagine that might raise temperatures? If you answer no, don’t bother answering in the first place.
The United States has a network of 1200+ USHCN stations with data going back to 1895 and earlier. The raw USHCN temperature record shows that there has been a slight cooling since 1920 (see above). USHCN is a subset of GHCND (Global Historical Climatology Network Daily.) Cooling doesn’t suit the needs of your masters, so they cherrypicked a small subset of GHCND stations (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record.
So let’s stop this madness, right? What happens when we take data from SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND SOURCES? That is, 1. stations active for a long time and 2. stations that don’t move (meaning keeping the same latitude). We see what I said above. NO. FUCKING. WARMING.
And yet there has been zero warming SINCE THEN, too, so you don’t have a leg to stand on.
Funny how sea level is identical to 1870 and 1901, huh? (La Jolla and La Jolla; Sydney and Sydney, respectively)? Funny how all the gauges show a 0.63mm/yr rise (which, again, is smaller than at any time in the last 11,000 years). Not 3.3. Not 2.6. Not 1.4. Certainly not “a meter by 2050.”
“But weather is becoming more extreme!”
Nah, less. Universally. What’s more, do you imagine? Not fires. Ha! Not floods.
USGS research has shown no linkage between flooding (either increases or decreases) and the increase in greenhouse gases. Essentially, from USGS long-term streamgage data for sites across the country with no regulation or other changes to the watershed that could influence the streamflow, the data shows no systematic increases in flooding through time.
Your world is. I am not repeating anything except facts. Somehow you keep linking shit to me. It isn't factual. I will not click on stupid links either. I don't know what you're even saying. I would if I read it. But it is moronic. Why the hell should I. I claimed something else.
The temperature has massively warmed recently. Only somehow you're telling me it hasn't. When it has. No debate. I provided an example, even a two year old would grasp, iceream go on how does it melt, no seriously, but somehow can't even understand that.
Next you bombard bullshit to me. I didn't claim any of that. You did. It wasn't my argument. It's your bullshit.
I claimed humans cause climate change. They factually do. I provided specific examples of it. Facts. Not your bullshit.
We are done you are fucking stupid. It's like you don't understand the meaning of words and concepts used, or have even studied basic geography and how weather and ecosystems work. Importantly you don't know how to communicate either.
Instead you pull bullshit out your asshole. I didn't claim any of that shit.
You live in a world your actions don't affect it. I pity you. You're selfish stupid and morally wrong. That's what you have told everybody. Your actions don't affect anything. Humans cannot cause climate change. They can on huge scales. We did that. But in your stupidity you've claimed your shit don't stink. Go peddle it to somebody else. You vile disgusting piece of shit. It's literally how stupid you are, you'd shit on street, and claim go on, read it. It doesn't affect the World. Where does your shit go. But oh no, shit on the street, it won't affect it. Basically it's the extent of your argument. Your actions do not affect anything. Humans cannot climate change. It's okay folks, shit on the street. If everybody shat on the street it wouldn't affect the weather. It actually would. It would stink for a start. What else would it cause?
Pathetic down vote. The temperature on your graphs has been rising. After the warm event that led to the dust bowl and great depression. Steadily. Where was the bar at. You admitted it's only average. Not specific states. Hurricanes have also increased. I am not downloading crap links. Or reading bullshit press like no glaciers in the Dark ages. Factually wrong. Hannibal lost how many elephants in the frozen Alps. Forgetting the two years of darkness. The mini ice-age from Vesuvius. There was also a warm period of extreme heat droughts slightly later. Another of extreme winters in Europe about 200 years ago. I never claimed rising oceans. I think population is actually causing a worse affect to any rise, drinking it quicker.
The rest of your bullshit is tedious. Cannot verify those sources either. Spurious.
I clicked on your dumb links. They were nothing what I claimed. When you claim bullshit first, it put me off the rest of them. Bullshit, no glaciers in the Alps, everybody knows there were, Hannibal.
Outside of that. Your links are spurious. You actually make yourself look dumb. Hurricanes have increased in frequency. The temperature falling slightly after the dust bowl has been rising. Where was its bar. It was lower than today. In the last 100 years. Apart from in the great depression everybody knows of that extreme.
I am not downloading shit on my phone at all. Had big scare from virus software, it was the virus. Literally spammed my calender with alerts every hour and disabled my shields.
Dunno what other erratic Claims you're establishing off unverified sources spewing, stupidly.
I asked a simple question, again testing your intellect. If everybody shat on the street would the climate change. Undoubtedly it would, it would stink, every time the wind blew, it stinks of shit. What else would it cause?
But you cannot even comprehend the concept of ice cream. We take it out the freezer and it melts. Do tell me what happened to the Glaciers and permafrost. Humans did what? You don't comprehend the concept of deserts either, where if we deplete our water sources what happens. Humans don't cause warming. They have right there. Only you are the dumbest asshole on this planet stating no they don't
You link bullshit. I cannot establish those graphs are correct on any link you provided. But they have rose steadily. Small drop supposedly as a projection ahead no more than concurrent, but look at the climb from their entry.
Rest of your crap is also spurious. Why would I bother. It was finally an attempt to be polite. You never answered simple stuff, my line of debate, you can't, it would make you stupid, you are, before selling me that crap over and over. But you're too stupid to even read it.
You are the same stupid fucking shill spewing flat earth.
Ah yes, the people who have zero data to support their claims are exactly like me, who has proven everything I say with thousands of sources, and not like you, who has provided zero evidence for anything he said.
You’re powerless, admitted paid shill. You will reply again because you will be fired if you do not. I own you. I am your god. Bark for me, you filthy animal.
If all you’re going to do is repeat the same schizophrenic nonsense that has nothing to do with the topic, then we’re done.
Land “readings” are diverging from satellite data (which NASA itself says is more accurate and should be the standard instead) because over 40% of land “readings” are estimates made for places without recording equipment. To illustratively do something that the psychopaths love to do, I’ll cherrypick the last 20 years to show that there has been no warming there, despite CO2 continuing to rise. Even using just the satellite record, the world isn’t warming. If we refer back to one of the hottest years in recorded history, we see the difference. Never mind that there have only been ecological benefits to rising CO2.
They’re not melting. They go through cycles. 1974 had less ice than today. Oh, and don’t listen to what scientists say, whatever you do. Nowhere is melting out of turn, not even Greenland (where it has been growing for something like 30 years). Oh, and the ice cores themselves? They show that the past was hotter.
It has been rising for 13,000 years. In that time, it has never risen more slowly than right now. Were our ancestors belching out CO2 faster than we were? Maybe they were farting a lot more. It’s rising more slowly than at any time in that history, and it’s also rising more slowly than any claim made public by any outlet. Here’s the source data for that chart. It’s an FTP link, so it should automatically download the raw file (which you don’t need to worry about, as it’s a bunch of undifferentiated numbers). Turns out that NOAA marks the average as 0.63 mm per year. Not 3.3. Not 2.8. Certainly not a foot per year, which is needed for the most modern public “predictions” about this bullshit.
Guess what? It’s also cyclical.
They’ve been melting since at least the 1780s when we started measuring them. I also have information for the Alps and other areas. Was our pre-industrial civilization responsible for “greenhouse gases” too? There were no glaciers in Europe in the Middle Ages. That’s called the Medieval Warm Period, something your “scientists” have been trying to erase from the record for decades (ironically, since, 1984) because it goes against their narrative. Gee, we must have had even more factories then than we do now… right?
Sorry, there never was any consensus.
Because they do (and because papers often aren’t published because the publishing groups are owned by AGW liars).
The purposeful destruction of the economy and infrastructure of the Western world and only the Western world.
None of the data supports the existence of AGW.
Because there is no other record of meaningful scientific value anywhere. Only the United States (and parts of Japan) has a temperature record that has been around long enough for climatological statements can be based on it. The GHCND set of stations has slowly been closed down… and what’s this! The stations being closed down ARE FAR FROM THE EQUATOR. What does that mean? The average latitude of GHCND stations IS FIFTEEN FUCKING DEGREES CLOSER TO THE EQUATOR than it used to be. Do you imagine that might raise temperatures? If you answer no, don’t bother answering in the first place.
The United States has a network of 1200+ USHCN stations with data going back to 1895 and earlier. The raw USHCN temperature record shows that there has been a slight cooling since 1920 (see above). USHCN is a subset of GHCND (Global Historical Climatology Network Daily.) Cooling doesn’t suit the needs of your masters, so they cherrypicked a small subset of GHCND stations (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record.
So let’s stop this madness, right? What happens when we take data from SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND SOURCES? That is, 1. stations active for a long time and 2. stations that don’t move (meaning keeping the same latitude). We see what I said above. NO. FUCKING. WARMING.
At the very best (for your delusions), you (meaning your own authorities) can say that there has been zero change since modern recordings began. Your bastard king himself, James Hansen, ADMITTED TO THIS.
And yet there has been zero warming SINCE THEN, too, so you don’t have a leg to stand on.
Funny how sea level is identical to 1870 and 1901, huh? (La Jolla and La Jolla; Sydney and Sydney, respectively)? Funny how all the gauges show a 0.63mm/yr rise (which, again, is smaller than at any time in the last 11,000 years). Not 3.3. Not 2.6. Not 1.4. Certainly not “a meter by 2050.”
Nah, less. Universally. What’s more, do you imagine? Not fires. Ha! Not floods.
Not tornadoes. Five (nearly six now) consecutive years of below average events. Not hurricanes. Every single indicator shows they’re not only becoming less frequent, but also less powerful. Not even drought. Hilarious! So what is it? What’s worse? Tell us. Is it anything at all? Anywhere? At any time? No. Of course, this has been known for a while. It’s global cooling’s fault, after all! Oh, wait… NOAA wouldn’t want you to hear this now, would they?
Your entire world is a hoax.
Your world is. I am not repeating anything except facts. Somehow you keep linking shit to me. It isn't factual. I will not click on stupid links either. I don't know what you're even saying. I would if I read it. But it is moronic. Why the hell should I. I claimed something else.
The temperature has massively warmed recently. Only somehow you're telling me it hasn't. When it has. No debate. I provided an example, even a two year old would grasp, iceream go on how does it melt, no seriously, but somehow can't even understand that.
Next you bombard bullshit to me. I didn't claim any of that. You did. It wasn't my argument. It's your bullshit.
I claimed humans cause climate change. They factually do. I provided specific examples of it. Facts. Not your bullshit.
We are done you are fucking stupid. It's like you don't understand the meaning of words and concepts used, or have even studied basic geography and how weather and ecosystems work. Importantly you don't know how to communicate either.
Instead you pull bullshit out your asshole. I didn't claim any of that shit.
You live in a world your actions don't affect it. I pity you. You're selfish stupid and morally wrong. That's what you have told everybody. Your actions don't affect anything. Humans cannot cause climate change. They can on huge scales. We did that. But in your stupidity you've claimed your shit don't stink. Go peddle it to somebody else. You vile disgusting piece of shit. It's literally how stupid you are, you'd shit on street, and claim go on, read it. It doesn't affect the World. Where does your shit go. But oh no, shit on the street, it won't affect it. Basically it's the extent of your argument. Your actions do not affect anything. Humans cannot climate change. It's okay folks, shit on the street. If everybody shat on the street it wouldn't affect the weather. It actually would. It would stink for a start. What else would it cause?
Pathetic down vote. The temperature on your graphs has been rising. After the warm event that led to the dust bowl and great depression. Steadily. Where was the bar at. You admitted it's only average. Not specific states. Hurricanes have also increased. I am not downloading crap links. Or reading bullshit press like no glaciers in the Dark ages. Factually wrong. Hannibal lost how many elephants in the frozen Alps. Forgetting the two years of darkness. The mini ice-age from Vesuvius. There was also a warm period of extreme heat droughts slightly later. Another of extreme winters in Europe about 200 years ago. I never claimed rising oceans. I think population is actually causing a worse affect to any rise, drinking it quicker.
The rest of your bullshit is tedious. Cannot verify those sources either. Spurious.
It’s magic, it really is.
Thanks for admitting that every recording institution on the face of the Earth says that global warming isn’t happening.
Proven falsehood. No data shows this.
Magic.
Yea, humans are doing nothing and all the data shows it. You are clinically insane.
Because it’s meaningless, since the analogy isn’t accurate.
Thanks for admitting AGW doesnt exist.
Proven falsehood.
You literally didn’t.
You said that before, but you’re paid to post lies on this website so you keep replying.
Irony.
Irony.
Irony.
Thanks for admitting that AGW doesn’t exist.
No one said this.
Said the AGW supporter.
Correct.
Thanks for admitting that every recording institution on the face of the Earth says that global warming isn’t happening.
Prove it, retard.
I clicked on your dumb links. They were nothing what I claimed. When you claim bullshit first, it put me off the rest of them. Bullshit, no glaciers in the Alps, everybody knows there were, Hannibal.
Outside of that. Your links are spurious. You actually make yourself look dumb. Hurricanes have increased in frequency. The temperature falling slightly after the dust bowl has been rising. Where was its bar. It was lower than today. In the last 100 years. Apart from in the great depression everybody knows of that extreme.
I am not downloading shit on my phone at all. Had big scare from virus software, it was the virus. Literally spammed my calender with alerts every hour and disabled my shields.
Dunno what other erratic Claims you're establishing off unverified sources spewing, stupidly.
I asked a simple question, again testing your intellect. If everybody shat on the street would the climate change. Undoubtedly it would, it would stink, every time the wind blew, it stinks of shit. What else would it cause?
But you cannot even comprehend the concept of ice cream. We take it out the freezer and it melts. Do tell me what happened to the Glaciers and permafrost. Humans did what? You don't comprehend the concept of deserts either, where if we deplete our water sources what happens. Humans don't cause warming. They have right there. Only you are the dumbest asshole on this planet stating no they don't
You link bullshit. I cannot establish those graphs are correct on any link you provided. But they have rose steadily. Small drop supposedly as a projection ahead no more than concurrent, but look at the climb from their entry.
Rest of your crap is also spurious. Why would I bother. It was finally an attempt to be polite. You never answered simple stuff, my line of debate, you can't, it would make you stupid, you are, before selling me that crap over and over. But you're too stupid to even read it.
Kill yourself.
Ah yes, the people who have zero data to support their claims are exactly like me, who has proven everything I say with thousands of sources, and not like you, who has provided zero evidence for anything he said.
Never happened. Kill yourself.
Kill yourself. It’s all peer reviewed.
Prove it, admitted paid shill.
Proven falsehood.
Proven falsehood.
Fell immediately.
Already linked.
Direct link to the raw data from the official sources.
No. Read.
Proven falsehood.
Thanks for admitting it’s all true.
Thanks for admitting the link is correct.
Thanks for admitting you lied and that AGW doesnt exist.
Thanks for admitting the earth isn’t warming.
You’ve posted no facts. [Kill yourself. (http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html)
You’re powerless, admitted paid shill. You will reply again because you will be fired if you do not. I own you. I am your god. Bark for me, you filthy animal.
Yes, that’s what happens when you get proven wrong.
They’re the only authority on the subject.
Proven falsehood.
Wrong.
Makes sense. Spreadsheets are a nightmare to work with on mobile devices.
If you go to the links you’ll find out.
NASA, NOAA, USGS, USHCN, and the European Climatological Institute are “unverified sources,” cocksucking retard?
I ignored it because you’re a paid shill.
Wrong.
Nothing climatological.
I love this sentence.
I don’t care. Humans didn’t do it.
We drink Brawndo instead.
Proven falsehood.
Nope. Everything you believe is a lie.
Thanks for admitting that all the links are unquestionable fact.
Sounds like a personal problem.
Proven false by everything I linked.
Nope, since modern records began.
They have only fallen since records began.
Thanks for admitting it’s all fact.
Please don’t bother. Please never post again, admitted paid shill.
Irony.
I couldn’t care less about your retarded non sequiturs.
Nope. I simply don’t care about it.