ANALYT'IC, adjective - " that resolves into first principles; that separates into parts" aka that whole (process of dying) which separates into partial (living); which implies that which RE (responds to) SOLVE (being within solution).
Resolve (living) into first principle (process of dying) represents transmutation of ingredient back to base (alchemy).
M'ARK, noun [Latin mercor, the primary sense of which is to go, to pass.] - "a visible line"...life represents the visible line within the invisible pass from inception towards death; hence those alive (choice) not being able to see their own inception/death (balance).
dialectic puppet-masters
If the many ignore perceivable sound for choice (suggested words) to choice (consent to suggested words) contract law; then the few become their dialectic puppet-masters.
OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe)
a) this represents the organ (process of dying); while this represents the instrument within (living).
b) this represents temptation (process of dying); while this represents the resistance within (living).
c) the only protection (security) for reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) represents momentum (balance within motion); which is why every one alive represents free will of choice at the center of balance (need/want) aka in-between the need to resist (living) and the want to be tempted to ignore resisting (dying).
d) nature (production) self differentiates into the process of dying (direction) and those living (reaction) within. That implies apartheid aka being a partial within whole.
The parasitic few suggest the inversion of perceivable apartheid....togetherness aka co-operation aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka "united" states aka "united" nations aka european "union" etc.
tl; dr...the few don't require the entire world as a tool to control the many, since consent by the many to the suggestions of the few tempts the many to react as "one" to whatever the few are suggesting.
Example...the few suggest "abortion" to which the many consent by wanting (pro-choice) or not wanting (pro-life) it. Both sides are then divided against each other; while responding as one (united) to the suggestion (abortion) of the few; who in return not only control both sides of the conflict; but also were given (by consent) the sole power (their choice) to define; redefine and contradict the suggested for everyone consenting to it.
tl; dr...the few don't require the entire world as a tool to control the many, since consent by the many to the suggestions of the few tempts the many to react as "one" to whatever the few are suggesting.
To this point, a lot of people laugh that the propaganda is lame and doesn't affect them, but it doesn't really matter, because the propaganda isn't for the common citizen, it is to convince government employees, journalists, CEOs, HR departments, the wealthy, etc. That segment wields a lot of power and if they believe the propaganda, that is 99% of the battle won for the banksters
to convince government employees, journalists, CEOs, HR departments, the wealthy, etc.
a) the foundation for GOVERN (to control) MENT (Latin mens, mind) represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law. Consenting to suggested puts one into a chain of command under those suggesting.
b) choice is situated at the center of perceivable balance (need/want), while consenting to the suggested choices of others tempts one into imbalance (want vs not want).
c) all the conflicts about suggested represent "reasoning". The few utilize suggestion to divide the many into reasoning against each other over the suggested.
d) employed vs unemployed, journalism (writer vs reader); CEO (chief executive officer) vs submissive subordinate follower; HR (human relations) vs lack of interaction among humans, departed (move from) mind vs mind moved by (inspiration perceived), the rich vs the poor etc.
All of these represent conflicts of reason shaped by consent of the many to the suggestions of the few; which gives the few the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and deliberately contradict (talmudic reasoning) whatever the many are reasoning over.
The many within each side of any of those conflicts will only view the opposite side, while ignoring both the contract (choice to choice aka consent to suggested) underneath; nor the contract holder outside the conflicts.
That segment wields a lot of power
Each segregated mind (segment) wields the power of free will of choice (partial) within perceivable balance (whole)...unless ignored for the suggested choices by others.
The few wield what the many willingly ignore to utilize. One cannot give free will of choice away only ignore using it, hence willingly repress the expression of choice within an impressing system.
the battle won for the banksters
a) reason represents the battle; winning vs losing represents the "banked" mind confined into a conflict caused by consenting to the suggestion (money) by others.
b) this represents value (perceivable inspiration); this represents evaluation (perceiving choice); this represents the temptation to ignore value (suggested information).
Whatever others are suggesting tempts one to ignore what perceivable nature is offering. One represents resistance (living) within temptation (dying)...others tempt one to ignore this perceivable natural order for following suggested orders.
ANALYT'IC, adjective - " that resolves into first principles; that separates into parts" aka that whole (process of dying) which separates into partial (living); which implies that which RE (responds to) SOLVE (being within solution).
Resolve (living) into first principle (process of dying) represents transmutation of ingredient back to base (alchemy).
M'ARK, noun [Latin mercor, the primary sense of which is to go, to pass.] - "a visible line"...life represents the visible line within the invisible pass from inception towards death; hence those alive (choice) not being able to see their own inception/death (balance).
If the many ignore perceivable sound for choice (suggested words) to choice (consent to suggested words) contract law; then the few become their dialectic puppet-masters.
a) this represents the organ (process of dying); while this represents the instrument within (living).
b) this represents temptation (process of dying); while this represents the resistance within (living).
c) the only protection (security) for reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) represents momentum (balance within motion); which is why every one alive represents free will of choice at the center of balance (need/want) aka in-between the need to resist (living) and the want to be tempted to ignore resisting (dying).
d) nature (production) self differentiates into the process of dying (direction) and those living (reaction) within. That implies apartheid aka being a partial within whole.
The parasitic few suggest the inversion of perceivable apartheid....togetherness aka co-operation aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka "united" states aka "united" nations aka european "union" etc.
tl; dr...the few don't require the entire world as a tool to control the many, since consent by the many to the suggestions of the few tempts the many to react as "one" to whatever the few are suggesting.
Example...the few suggest "abortion" to which the many consent by wanting (pro-choice) or not wanting (pro-life) it. Both sides are then divided against each other; while responding as one (united) to the suggestion (abortion) of the few; who in return not only control both sides of the conflict; but also were given (by consent) the sole power (their choice) to define; redefine and contradict the suggested for everyone consenting to it.
To this point, a lot of people laugh that the propaganda is lame and doesn't affect them, but it doesn't really matter, because the propaganda isn't for the common citizen, it is to convince government employees, journalists, CEOs, HR departments, the wealthy, etc. That segment wields a lot of power and if they believe the propaganda, that is 99% of the battle won for the banksters
a) the foundation for GOVERN (to control) MENT (Latin mens, mind) represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law. Consenting to suggested puts one into a chain of command under those suggesting.
b) choice is situated at the center of perceivable balance (need/want), while consenting to the suggested choices of others tempts one into imbalance (want vs not want).
c) all the conflicts about suggested represent "reasoning". The few utilize suggestion to divide the many into reasoning against each other over the suggested.
d) employed vs unemployed, journalism (writer vs reader); CEO (chief executive officer) vs submissive subordinate follower; HR (human relations) vs lack of interaction among humans, departed (move from) mind vs mind moved by (inspiration perceived), the rich vs the poor etc.
All of these represent conflicts of reason shaped by consent of the many to the suggestions of the few; which gives the few the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and deliberately contradict (talmudic reasoning) whatever the many are reasoning over.
The many within each side of any of those conflicts will only view the opposite side, while ignoring both the contract (choice to choice aka consent to suggested) underneath; nor the contract holder outside the conflicts.
Each segregated mind (segment) wields the power of free will of choice (partial) within perceivable balance (whole)...unless ignored for the suggested choices by others.
The few wield what the many willingly ignore to utilize. One cannot give free will of choice away only ignore using it, hence willingly repress the expression of choice within an impressing system.
a) reason represents the battle; winning vs losing represents the "banked" mind confined into a conflict caused by consenting to the suggestion (money) by others.
b) this represents value (perceivable inspiration); this represents evaluation (perceiving choice); this represents the temptation to ignore value (suggested information).
Whatever others are suggesting tempts one to ignore what perceivable nature is offering. One represents resistance (living) within temptation (dying)...others tempt one to ignore this perceivable natural order for following suggested orders.