If you spend 40 minutes this week watching ANY videos, make it this one.
This one explains HOW, WHY and partially WHO control the agenda, the talking points, the dialectic AND most importantly the IMPACT all those are supposed to get to.
If you do NOT understand how the game is played, you are constantly REACTING to the provocations that the game runners planned, launched and executed months ago.
By the time you react to their latest trickery of:
BLM
George Floyd
January 6th "insurrection"
etc.
The game runners have already planned and executed the next provocation that you will be reacting to... in the next coming 6 months.
The only way to break this cycle is to:
Understand what they are planning next
STOP reacting to their obvious provocations ( this forum is FULL of emotional reactions to trickeries launched by the game runners)
Start using your time judiciously to build something new and practically useful PROACTIVELY, and not just reacting to the provocations.
Once you GET IT, youl'll stop watching, posting and reacting to shit on MSNBC/Fox/WSJ/WaPo/NYT/CNN/BBC/etc.
It's all a dialectic game the aim of which is to get you emotionally engaged and get the mass impact from that.
I fully agree that people, especially if you believe to be a smart person, should stop watching the day to day political theatre, because it is all useles. Sure, you must scan the news in order to see the general pattern, but debating the stupid theatrics everyday or every week is something only children and imbeciles who cant see trends do...
Now, I take issue with the "Marxist" characterisation. This is not because Marxism is good, or because I'm pro Marxism, but this sort of term implies in the mind of the reader that the what he knows as the "opposite" must surely be good, aka he reflectively thinks that someone who attacks Marxism must be good. This is WRONG.
First of all, because the same ppl that financed the Marxist-communist political systems also financed National-Socialism, and also finance both sides of every fucking conflict all over the world. They also finance BLM, the alt-right, your average cuckservative, and demoncrap politician (there are exceptions!)... What you have to support, is ONLY PRINCIPLES. NEVER SUPPORT SIDES.
a) how could one grow (within perceivable) if one chooses to understand (stand under suggested)?
b) if everything (perceivable); then nothing (suggested)
c) implication (if/then) or reason (want vs NOT want)...your choice. Let's apply it...if living; then dying or want living vs not want dying. Which one contradicts itself?
The game runners
Are the few running or do they suggest the many where to run towards (progressivism)? What if consenting to a suggested game implies being played by others within perceivable?
STOP reacting
Can reaction (living) STOP (cessation of motion) within enacting (process of dying)?
Once you GET IT
What if each one being able to perceive already got everything perceivable to choose within?
to break this cycle
What if consent to suggested collectivism (togetherness); while ignoring perceivable apartheid (being partial within whole) represents a self imposed KIKE; noun - "circle; ring (ouroboros); a visible sign (imbalance) of an invisible bond (choice to choice contract law)"?
What if the many ignore being (living) within (process of dying), which allows the few to lure them into a self destructive cycle (not want); which in return tempts them to "want" to break out?
What if want vs not want represents the self destructive cycle (imbalance); which tempts one to ignore being choice at the center of balance (need/want)?
youl'll stop watching, posting and reacting to shit
Can the perceiving within perceivable ever stop falling for the tempting suggestions by others? What if resisting (perceivable need) temptation (suggested want) grows resistance (living) within temptation (process of dying)?
Does it matter what others are suggesting or does each ones resistance to whatever others are suggesting represents the sustenance of matter (living) within immaterial (process of dying)?
If you spend 40 minutes this week watching ANY videos, make it this one.
This one explains HOW, WHY and partially WHO control the agenda, the talking points, the dialectic AND most importantly the IMPACT all those are supposed to get to.
If you do NOT understand how the game is played, you are constantly REACTING to the provocations that the game runners planned, launched and executed months ago.
By the time you react to their latest trickery of:
The game runners have already planned and executed the next provocation that you will be reacting to... in the next coming 6 months.
The only way to break this cycle is to:
Understand what they are planning next
STOP reacting to their obvious provocations ( this forum is FULL of emotional reactions to trickeries launched by the game runners)
Start using your time judiciously to build something new and practically useful PROACTIVELY, and not just reacting to the provocations.
Once you GET IT, youl'll stop watching, posting and reacting to shit on MSNBC/Fox/WSJ/WaPo/NYT/CNN/BBC/etc.
It's all a dialectic game the aim of which is to get you emotionally engaged and get the mass impact from that.
See also the author's web site: https://unconstrainedanalytics.org/blog/
I just want to give my 2 cents.
I fully agree that people, especially if you believe to be a smart person, should stop watching the day to day political theatre, because it is all useles. Sure, you must scan the news in order to see the general pattern, but debating the stupid theatrics everyday or every week is something only children and imbeciles who cant see trends do...
Now, I take issue with the "Marxist" characterisation. This is not because Marxism is good, or because I'm pro Marxism, but this sort of term implies in the mind of the reader that the what he knows as the "opposite" must surely be good, aka he reflectively thinks that someone who attacks Marxism must be good. This is WRONG.
First of all, because the same ppl that financed the Marxist-communist political systems also financed National-Socialism, and also finance both sides of every fucking conflict all over the world. They also finance BLM, the alt-right, your average cuckservative, and demoncrap politician (there are exceptions!)... What you have to support, is ONLY PRINCIPLES. NEVER SUPPORT SIDES.
Amen
a) how could one grow (within perceivable) if one chooses to understand (stand under suggested)?
b) if everything (perceivable); then nothing (suggested)
c) implication (if/then) or reason (want vs NOT want)...your choice. Let's apply it...if living; then dying or want living vs not want dying. Which one contradicts itself?
Are the few running or do they suggest the many where to run towards (progressivism)? What if consenting to a suggested game implies being played by others within perceivable?
Can reaction (living) STOP (cessation of motion) within enacting (process of dying)?
What if each one being able to perceive already got everything perceivable to choose within?
What if consent to suggested collectivism (togetherness); while ignoring perceivable apartheid (being partial within whole) represents a self imposed KIKE; noun - "circle; ring (ouroboros); a visible sign (imbalance) of an invisible bond (choice to choice contract law)"?
What if the many ignore being (living) within (process of dying), which allows the few to lure them into a self destructive cycle (not want); which in return tempts them to "want" to break out?
What if want vs not want represents the self destructive cycle (imbalance); which tempts one to ignore being choice at the center of balance (need/want)?
Can the perceiving within perceivable ever stop falling for the tempting suggestions by others? What if resisting (perceivable need) temptation (suggested want) grows resistance (living) within temptation (process of dying)?
Does it matter what others are suggesting or does each ones resistance to whatever others are suggesting represents the sustenance of matter (living) within immaterial (process of dying)?