They do include the jet fuel which is really the solid part of the plane even though technically it's a liquid. It's really the weight of the fuel which damages the external part of the building. I think the biggest flaw is the engines simply disappear in the model.
I see your point, but the wings of a plane are so weak that they can't support much more than their own weight, I mean passenger planes not fighter jets that might hit mach 5-10.
The only parts of the plane that should have even punctured the building was the fuselage, gas tanks and engines. None of the rest of it has enough density where even if we assume the claimed speed that should have been able to break the structure.
Well if you look at high resolution photos it was only really those parts that penetrated the building. Some of what you see with regards to damage was just the external cladding not the underlying beams.
They do include the jet fuel which is really the solid part of the plane even though technically it's a liquid. It's really the weight of the fuel which damages the external part of the building. I think the biggest flaw is the engines simply disappear in the model.
I see your point, but the wings of a plane are so weak that they can't support much more than their own weight, I mean passenger planes not fighter jets that might hit mach 5-10.
The only parts of the plane that should have even punctured the building was the fuselage, gas tanks and engines. None of the rest of it has enough density where even if we assume the claimed speed that should have been able to break the structure.
Well if you look at high resolution photos it was only really those parts that penetrated the building. Some of what you see with regards to damage was just the external cladding not the underlying beams.
Which is unfortunate because closely watching the video, the real plane also does not show any deformation either.