Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

20
Look at all the pro-ukraine shills who were celebrating Crimean bridge terrorist attack now screaming and whining over payback. It cries in pain as it strikes you! Long thread of many examples (twitter.com)
posted 3 years ago by Beatolddoss 3 years ago by Beatolddoss +22 / -2
19 comments share
19 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– MudFlood 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

They knocked out power, sewage, govt buildings, etc. This was a pretty heavy attack in my opinion. Heavy enough that there are some that see peace deals on the horizon. Anyway, I hope peace comes, but it seems, oddly enough, that the only Country that wants peace and has tried is Russia. Go figure.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Heavy sustained until they yield. Not whoosh. 1 hit wonder. Wonder what was that. Set up the next volley. Keep them on edge. I am categorically not saying this as a Russian. I am not, I'm pragmatic. Studied history and read some strategy.

Peace comes when they bow. They won't.

I don't care except there is no peace because both sides want what the other will not give, and there's almost no room for compromise, making it an empty gesture.

Any talks stall peace, any ceasefire arms the enemy. Peace takes even more provoking.

The narrative has dismissed peace with Russia, it has no fuel and cannot ship or fly supplies in, because the bridge is out of commission, and it has no diesel refineries. So charge at them, they will fail. They don't have any more hypersonics and very few cruise left. Seriously laughable. But it's the narrative.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MudFlood 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It is strange, here in the West they don't speak of the past votes of the re-acquired and now annexed regions of Ukraine. I looked into it and the vote was the same a decade or two ago (on two occasions) as they are mostly ethnic Russians. And they don't mention the 2014 coup! lol

They don't talk about the verbal assurances made after 91' or so (where a few leaders said NATO would not move East.) They don't mention the killing of 14,000 (?) Russians in Donbass and they are now defending the Nazi's who do the killing there.

And the news won't even mention the Bio-labs (and the UN won't consider it.)

You know, on the one hand this seems like a planned set-up for a large war. I just don't get it outside that. It makes zero sense to push Russia into this war and MANY Westerners see this, but we have almost zero control of our deep state "leaders".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Ep0ch 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It is a much larger geopolitical war. And it is a conflict that is a serving agenda by driving change. Outside of this it was easily provoked begging the obvious. Did they want to fight Russia directly or simply contain Russia and using that opportunity to enlist sudden change. Look at the market, recession, new emerging technology, renewables, and supposed methods. While at the same time drawing out this conflict and prompting it.

How it plays out. A peace deal must be offered. Otherwise it could escalate into nuclear conflict. But a peace deal is no where in the making and even if there is some temporary peace it could still cause war later. A peace deal presently must recognise Ukraine isn't what it think it is territorially. Otherwise there is war. A peace deal must look to stop all aggression later.

Ukraine could never make that deal. It will arm and fight for its entire territory while it is armed. Russia will not lose the Crimea, or any present oblasts now under its sovereignty.

It was aggressive Nato expansion that caused this conflict, and bad Russian policy losing its own former allies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MudFlood 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Great post, thanks for the insight!

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy