Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Anthony C. Sutton:
‘The contribution made by American capitalism to German war preparations can only be described as phenomenal. It was certainly crucial to German military capabilities... Not only was an influential sector of American business aware of the nature of Naziism, but for its own purposes aided Naziism wherever possible (and profitable) - with full knowledge that the probable outcome would be war involving Europe and the United States.’ Penetrating a cloak of falsehood, deception and duplicity, Professor Antony C. Sutton reveals one of the most remarkable but unreported facts of the Second World War: that key Wall Street banks and American businesses supported Hitler’s rise to power by financing and trading with Nazi Germany. Carefully tracing this closely guarded secret through original documents and eyewitness accounts, Sutton comes to the unsavoury conclusion that the catastrophic Second World War was extremely profitable for a select group of financial insiders. He presents a thoroughly documented account of the role played by J.P. Morgan, T.W. Lamont, the Rockefeller interests, General Electric Company, Standard Oil, National City Bank, Chase and Manhattan banks, Kuhn, Loeb and Company, General Motors, the Ford Motor Company, and scores of others in helping to prepare the bloodiest, most destructive war in history.
It’s not just a platitude it’s the truth. You wrote this entire response and instead of just offering fourth and argument. This board is meant for discussion so if you just refuse to explain yourself or even argue a point, then everyone else is perfectly justified to just trash your post.
First, I made comment on how 'discussion' is termed argument. So it becomes one.....instead. Discussion is having a base of information to discuss. Flat earth has no base for discussion. Therefore, arguments. The base would be knowledge of physics etc that discludes such 'arguments'.
So I said 'arguments' are for clowns, meaning that discussions should be had by using a knowledgeable base. That would require study which requires books.
Until that's done by those having the 'discussion', only arguments can be had in their stead.
Some subjects can't be gleaned by guesswork by committee.