Jake Tapper's parents tried tax evasion but to be fair it was a noble effort, citing they didn't want to help the US pay for the bullshit Vietnam war crimes https://is2.4chan.org/pol/1665031864107990.png
Taylor Lorenz's parents own the Way Back Machine I think Taylor Lorenz fits this as well: she came from a rich family that sent her to private schools and unis, and she's been the gay lobby's pit bull at the Washington Post.
Anderson Coppoer = Anderson Vanderbilt
Matt Yglesias people knew about. Fareed Zakaria, whose parents are effectively foreign royalty.
I looked into German Journalists recently. Turns out the main propaganda outlet for Ukraine BILD has reporters assigned that are either Gay or Jewish. I dom‘t make this up. Look up Rinzheimer & Piatov. These two assholes cry non-stop for more war and more money sunk with these clowns
Tbf Tucker Carlson is a billionaire in waiting due to his stepmother's fortune, and Hannity makes $50m a year as thanks for promoting the War on Terror robbery and Saddam narrative, now he coasts on blooper reels.
Mika Brzezinski of Morning Joe, is the daughter of Zbigniew Brzezinski. His other 2 sons are diplomats and deep statists.
a) JOURNAL, noun (Latin diurnum) - "a diary; an account of daily transactions and events" + ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit"
b) all suggested information is recorded (registry) within ones memory through CREDIT, noun [Latin creed.] - "belief; faith" aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
c) holding onto suggested information (repression) within a system of perceivable inspiration (impression) puts a DEBT, noun [Latin debitum, contract.] on expression.
d) within impressing (process of dying) one needs to express (living); while resisting the temptation of repression or as Madonna puts it: "express yourself; don't repress yourself"..."and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
We know what words mean bro, you don’t have to do this for every thread.
a) do you perceive words or are they suggested to you?
b) what comes first...suggested words or perceivable sound?
c) does nature utter temporary words or does it represent the source of ongoing sound?
d) if the few suggest "insane person"; then could the many be tempted to ignore perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of and therefore in response to the source of perceivable sound?
e) could the few craft the spelling (spell-craft) of the many; if the many consent to (mis-) communicate with the suggested words of the few?
f) what if reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) cannot define meaning, only suggest meaning (words); while ignoring predefined; perceivable meaning (sound).
Does living mean dying? Is life predefined by being moved from inception towards death?
g) what if "one" (apartheid) represents perceivable (reality); while "we" (collectivism) represents suggested (fiction)? Does "we" exist without "one" suggesting the label "we"?
Are you one or are you we? If one defines oneself as a part of we; then that implies "one" partial of we.
h) can you give me any word that others aren't reasoning with each other over its meaning?