I hear ya not trusting FREEMASONIC controlled science. I follow the latest exoplanet discoveries almost everyday. Who the hell should trust these universities/ESTABLISHMENT anymore after the way they've been acting the last several years. I do buy the globehead model.. Mainly thru observation.
I hear ya not trusting FREEMASONIC controlled science
One of science’s greatest strengths is that it requires no, and is directly hindered by, trust. Trust/belief is known by another name in science; bias. It is to be avoided, excised, and suppressed whenever possible.
Personally, i am a fan of real science. But discerning between it and pseudoscience/mythology/religion masquerading as it is impossible for most people. They simply don’t know what science is, and the common colloquial definitions most learn are plainly incorrect.
I do buy the globehead model.. Mainly thru observation
Fair enough! Making your own informed decisions, and doing your own thorough/rigorous validation on encountered claims (of which facts are merely one type) before you accept them are the most important things.
I used to, as we are intended, “buy” the globe model as well - but i have found through my research that it does not withstand scrutiny. It was merely assumed to be true over 2000 years ago and disingenuously/erroneously taught as validated fact to virtually every student since then.
I hear ya not trusting FREEMASONIC controlled science. I follow the latest exoplanet discoveries almost everyday. Who the hell should trust these universities/ESTABLISHMENT anymore after the way they've been acting the last several years. I do buy the globehead model.. Mainly thru observation.
One of science’s greatest strengths is that it requires no, and is directly hindered by, trust. Trust/belief is known by another name in science; bias. It is to be avoided, excised, and suppressed whenever possible.
Personally, i am a fan of real science. But discerning between it and pseudoscience/mythology/religion masquerading as it is impossible for most people. They simply don’t know what science is, and the common colloquial definitions most learn are plainly incorrect.
Fair enough! Making your own informed decisions, and doing your own thorough/rigorous validation on encountered claims (of which facts are merely one type) before you accept them are the most important things.
I used to, as we are intended, “buy” the globe model as well - but i have found through my research that it does not withstand scrutiny. It was merely assumed to be true over 2000 years ago and disingenuously/erroneously taught as validated fact to virtually every student since then.