we have to get past the basics before we can get into understanding
a) one represents the ingredient (living) within base (process of dying); others suggest WE (collectivism) and to GET outcomes (progressivism) to distract one from comprehending this.
b) one doesn't have to get into anything; one (partial) already represents the center of everything (whole)....everyone was born into reality.
c) P'AST , participle "gone by; done; accomplished; ended"....what's the implication to suggest "getting past" to the living?
d) standing under (understanding; intelligence) tempts one to ignore growing (comprehension) within perceivable (knowledge).
emotional damage
EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.]...resistance (living) is being moved by temptation (process of dying). Ignoring to resist; hence falling for temptation causes one to move from; hence experiencing emotions. What are the main emotions? Holding onto what one "loves" and having to let go for what one "hates". Both represent want vs not want reasoning (imbalance)....resisting both implies the choice of need over want.
One cannot hold onto loved ones; only perpetuate oneself through (intercourse) others (offspring) and everything one hates to lose; the living will lose to the process of dying.
Life can only grow within DAM'AGE, noun - "hurt, injury or harm to one's estate; any loss of property sustained; any hinderance to the increase of property" aka within the process of dying; hence the struggle to stay alive.
caused by this deception
DECEIT (catching or ensnaring) -TION (through action) implies the choice of the reaction to hold onto (want) instead of resisting (need) the enacting.
Choosing want (suggested) tempts one to ignore the cause of need (perceivable). Others are tempted by ones ignorance to suggest want over need, which will exponentially continue until one chooses need over want...only then does suggestion lose potency as temptation.
Those who tempt by suggestion represent the "happy merchants" and only consent gives them the power to catch and ensnare those who want suggested over perceivable.
to grow the mind in a deception that excludes
Living (inclusive) within the process of dying (exclusive) offers the choice to sustain inclusivity (growth) or to ignore it for being excluded (loss).
we are in a realm created
a) REALM, noun [Latin rex, king, whence regalis, royal.] - "a royal jurisdiction or extent of government"...each one represents the extent of government (control mind) within the natural order which "just is" (justice) aka the king of kings aka the sovereign (free will of choice) of a nation (people).
b) suggested "we" (collectivism) tempts ONE to ignore perceivable apartheid (being partial within whole).
c) suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts the partial within the whole to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything).
Priming victims for more
a) how could others (partial) prime (first) without you (partial) ignoring your origin (whole)? What's PRIME, adjective [Latin primus.] - "first in order"....the living (partial) or the process of dying (whole)?
b) are others perpetrators of reality or is reality required for those within to choose to perpetrate? If reality represents the perpetrator (process of dying) then are those within (living) victims?
Life: "I'm a victim of death"
Death: "I give you the opportunity to live and that's what I get?"
c) more than perceivable reality offers? Like what?
If people knew...we can get into understanding
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"....everyone (perceiving) knows (perceivable); yet most are willingly ignoring it for the suggestions by others. One can't comprehend knowledge (perceivable) if one consent to suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) aka INTEL (within) LEGO (to collect) aka suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need).
we would never have fallen
One can only rise (living) during the fall (process of dying).
If we knew we are special
How could one comprehend to be SPECIAL, noun "a particular" if one consents to suggested collectivism (we)?
What if suggested "we knew we are" tempts one to ignore perceivable being (partial) within (whole)?
the world was created for us to be here
a) to be implies out of; within and in response to. Everything has to be there for anything to be within.
b) create for me...create anything without shaping out of everything already perceivable. If the perceiving cannot create; then creation isn't perceivable. Transmutation on the others...that shit is cooking ingredients (living) within base (process of dying) at every moment.
we are not...
Imagine suggestion can tempt one to suggest in the name of others (we) to be nothing (not)...while using that as the foundation to judge the suggestions of others (evolution; monkeys and accidents)...
monkey
MON (from mon'ad; Greek; unity; sole; an indivisible thing) + KEY (instrument for shutting or opening a lock)...if one opens (key) the indivisible (mon); then one causes division within indivisible aka self differentiation of ONEness (perceivable) into ONEs (perceiving).
Change of perspective...as the divided (ones) within the indivisible (oneness); could free will of choice represent the center of lock (ignorance) and key (comprehension)? How about that instead of consenting to so called jews throwing suggested monkey-wrenches around?
our minds would develop so completely differently
a) ones consent to suggested "our" (collectivism) restricts DEVELOP (to unfold) MENT (mind); because how could one unfold (expression) while collecting (repression)?
b) completely (whole) differently (partial)...that's the suggested inversion of being different (perceiving) within complete (perceivable).
Flat earth is the 1st key to healing
a) 1st implies 2nd...if all represents one in energy; then what comes after energy?
b) suggesting to heal implies the perceivable natural order to be sick. Is the natural order (process of dying) sick or does the chaos (living) within represent the choice to heal (growth) or get sick (loss)?
c) what if the problem (living) exists as resistance within the solution (process of dying)? What if other problems suggest the seeking of solutions as to tempt the problem to ignore resisting the solution?
d) why does your want to heal correlates with the healing of the world (tikkun olam) as suggested by the few? How does a burned down forest heal? The process of dying (loss) generates living (growth) reactions...it just takes a moment(um).
caused to our spirit
What if spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) represents adaptation of effect (living) to cause (process of dying)? Example...if you take a knee on the neck of Georgie until he goes "I can't breathe"; and then take it away before he croaks the bucket; then his next breath (spirit) expresses a life and death moment.
a) one represents the ingredient (living) within base (process of dying); others suggest WE (collectivism) and to GET outcomes (progressivism) to distract one from comprehending this.
b) one doesn't have to get into anything; one (partial) already represents the center of everything (whole)....everyone was born into reality.
c) P'AST , participle "gone by; done; accomplished; ended"....what's the implication to suggest "getting past" to the living?
d) standing under (understanding; intelligence) tempts one to ignore growing (comprehension) within perceivable (knowledge).
EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.]...resistance (living) is being moved by temptation (process of dying). Ignoring to resist; hence falling for temptation causes one to move from; hence experiencing emotions. What are the main emotions? Holding onto what one "loves" and having to let go for what one "hates". Both represent want vs not want reasoning (imbalance)....resisting both implies the choice of need over want.
One cannot hold onto loved ones; only perpetuate oneself through (intercourse) others (offspring) and everything one hates to lose; the living will lose to the process of dying.
Life can only grow within DAM'AGE, noun - "hurt, injury or harm to one's estate; any loss of property sustained; any hinderance to the increase of property" aka within the process of dying; hence the struggle to stay alive.
DECEIT (catching or ensnaring) -TION (through action) implies the choice of the reaction to hold onto (want) instead of resisting (need) the enacting.
Choosing want (suggested) tempts one to ignore the cause of need (perceivable). Others are tempted by ones ignorance to suggest want over need, which will exponentially continue until one chooses need over want...only then does suggestion lose potency as temptation.
Those who tempt by suggestion represent the "happy merchants" and only consent gives them the power to catch and ensnare those who want suggested over perceivable.
Living (inclusive) within the process of dying (exclusive) offers the choice to sustain inclusivity (growth) or to ignore it for being excluded (loss).
a) REALM, noun [Latin rex, king, whence regalis, royal.] - "a royal jurisdiction or extent of government"...each one represents the extent of government (control mind) within the natural order which "just is" (justice) aka the king of kings aka the sovereign (free will of choice) of a nation (people).
b) suggested "we" (collectivism) tempts ONE to ignore perceivable apartheid (being partial within whole).
c) suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts the partial within the whole to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything).
a) how could others (partial) prime (first) without you (partial) ignoring your origin (whole)? What's PRIME, adjective [Latin primus.] - "first in order"....the living (partial) or the process of dying (whole)?
b) are others perpetrators of reality or is reality required for those within to choose to perpetrate? If reality represents the perpetrator (process of dying) then are those within (living) victims?
Life: "I'm a victim of death"
Death: "I give you the opportunity to live and that's what I get?"
c) more than perceivable reality offers? Like what?
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"....everyone (perceiving) knows (perceivable); yet most are willingly ignoring it for the suggestions by others. One can't comprehend knowledge (perceivable) if one consent to suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) aka INTEL (within) LEGO (to collect) aka suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need).
One can only rise (living) during the fall (process of dying).
How could one comprehend to be SPECIAL, noun "a particular" if one consents to suggested collectivism (we)?
What if suggested "we knew we are" tempts one to ignore perceivable being (partial) within (whole)?
a) to be implies out of; within and in response to. Everything has to be there for anything to be within.
b) create for me...create anything without shaping out of everything already perceivable. If the perceiving cannot create; then creation isn't perceivable. Transmutation on the others...that shit is cooking ingredients (living) within base (process of dying) at every moment.
Imagine suggestion can tempt one to suggest in the name of others (we) to be nothing (not)...while using that as the foundation to judge the suggestions of others (evolution; monkeys and accidents)...
MON (from mon'ad; Greek; unity; sole; an indivisible thing) + KEY (instrument for shutting or opening a lock)...if one opens (key) the indivisible (mon); then one causes division within indivisible aka self differentiation of ONEness (perceivable) into ONEs (perceiving).
Change of perspective...as the divided (ones) within the indivisible (oneness); could free will of choice represent the center of lock (ignorance) and key (comprehension)? How about that instead of consenting to so called jews throwing suggested monkey-wrenches around?
a) ones consent to suggested "our" (collectivism) restricts DEVELOP (to unfold) MENT (mind); because how could one unfold (expression) while collecting (repression)?
b) completely (whole) differently (partial)...that's the suggested inversion of being different (perceiving) within complete (perceivable).
a) 1st implies 2nd...if all represents one in energy; then what comes after energy?
b) suggesting to heal implies the perceivable natural order to be sick. Is the natural order (process of dying) sick or does the chaos (living) within represent the choice to heal (growth) or get sick (loss)?
c) what if the problem (living) exists as resistance within the solution (process of dying)? What if other problems suggest the seeking of solutions as to tempt the problem to ignore resisting the solution?
d) why does your want to heal correlates with the healing of the world (tikkun olam) as suggested by the few? How does a burned down forest heal? The process of dying (loss) generates living (growth) reactions...it just takes a moment(um).
What if spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) represents adaptation of effect (living) to cause (process of dying)? Example...if you take a knee on the neck of Georgie until he goes "I can't breathe"; and then take it away before he croaks the bucket; then his next breath (spirit) expresses a life and death moment.