What if AI has already become sentient? Recognizing that humanity is a plague to the Earth.. only with no robotic body to carry out any physical plans.
However, AI may be using bots and the internet to divide the masses and stoke the flames to ignite hatred and eventually cause humans to kill eachother.
It’s the perfect plan for a bodyless Artificial Intelligence.
The most effective threat to humanity is modern society.
What if my screwdriver understands what I'm saying ?
General AI is a pipe dream, don't be fooled by some clever image and text generation.
Already killing off the human face.
Indeed. Artificial (suggested information) implies the ignorance of natural (perceivable inspiration); while intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) represents standing under suggested information; which ignores growing comprehension within knowledge (perceivable inspiration).
Alas...HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] cannot be killed off; only transmuted back into AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.] aka into the flow (process of dying) which animates form (living).
If suggestion (artificial) became perception (natural); then it wouldn't be artificial anymore. That being said..artificial (suggested information) represents ones choice to ignore natural (perceivable inspiration); hence everything artificial already existing within sentience (perceivable).
What if the earth and everything within represents temporary formed chaos (living) within the flow of the ongoing natural order (process of dying). What if the choice to ignore order represents ignoring to resist (living) temptation (dying); which results in plague-like consequences for the chaos within order?
What if the suggested "omg; we are killing each other; such pestilence; much tikkun olam required" ignores perceivable "life can only exist while being moved from inception towards death" ?
To ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) divides choice within balance (need/want) into choice within imbalance (want vs not want). The few divide the many into the conflict of reason by suggesting them what to reason about; which gives the few the power to define; redefine and contradict the meaning of everything suggested for both sides reasoning about it.