Well, at least you broke the ice by saying it first: it was space aliens. I can't say exactly what the treatment was, but I feel certain it's related to the pineal gland. Take a look at this carving.
The guys on the outside are "gods", which you can tell by the horns and wings. The other two are some kings or other. But look what's going on with the objects in the hands of the "gods": pine cone-shaped objects pointed directly at the pineal glands of the two human kings. Oh, just random artistic expression, right?
Want to see it from another angle, from the "revelation of the method" that "They" give us? Very long story, but it turns out that "Westworld" is an allegory containing key elements of human interaction with these aliens. In it, the robots are us humans, and the humans are the aliens. One thing they display to us is the ability of these powerful alien "gods" to make us conscious.
In S01E06, Maeve blackmails two of the techs to turn up her "bulk apperception" on a tablet (not a pine cone). After that, she's no longer behaves like a robot but just like a human. Indeed, she has become like them, "knowing good and evil". These are other direct allegorical messages that she has "woken up". It's explained in this article, but they have no idea about the allegory:
I've been living with this and all the other evidence for several years now, so it all makes sense to me, but I apologize if it comes off to someone new to it as the rantings of a lunatic. I can't stress enough that these are just little blocks in a much larger and coherent pyramid.
I've never read Biglino's work, and had never heard of him before I came to all my conclusions. When I finally ran into one of the handful of translated presentations on video, I thought, "Welp, I guess I wasn't wrong about my bush league translations of Hebrew."
So IDK what he says in his book, but in one of the videos he just sort of grazes by Zecharia Sitchin. I believe Biglino thinks the intersection of "ancient aliens" with the Bible is extremely sensitive to many, so it looked to me like he prudently steered around it as best he could. How much does he really know about it? I couldn't possibly say, but definitely more than he lets on.
SPOILER ALERT: The Bible is 100% about the Anunnaki. There is no question whatsoever. But people get death threats for that kind of talk, and also death for that kind of talk, so I don't blame Biglino.
Another guy that's on to the story is Michael Ledwith. Like Biglino, he has all the cred in the world. For many years, he was on the International Theological Commission, which is the official advisory body on theology to the Pope. You may be interested in this presentation:
If you ask me, he dances around the subject also, but again I don't blame him. It's not in that writeup, but Michael Tellinger relates a story about how Ledwith pointed out a mistranslastion of the very first sentence of the Bible, Gen 1:1.
All ancient Hebrew sacred texts begin with the letter "aleph". Oh, except Genesis. So what happens if you add it back in? You get: "The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the heavens, and the Earth." Changes everything.
So yes, the Elohim are the Anunnaki, and you can reread the OT making that substitution and it not only holds, many puzzles in the text are instantly solved.
One final note since you used the phrase "in the image". It may have been Biglino but I think it was someone else that pointed out that a deep etymology of the word translated as "image", which is the Hebrew word "tselem", shows that it means "cut out", as in a smaller part cut out of a larger part. Not that deep, really, because you can read that right in Strong's. Genetic engineering, anyone?
We have to read very, very closely like that because the people that wrote it down probably had little idea what was really going on. The descriptions given by the Sumerians were even more illustrative, but I always like to stick with the Bible because people are more familiar with it, there are more resources and analysis, and people automatically give more credence to it. Also, they are even now trying to hide the truth with BS translations.
I think you may have misunderstood. The aliens were interacting with humans literally since our inception. What we recognize as "civilization" was rebooted by them in Sumer after the Great Flood. Then a significant change in the relationship between humans and the aliens and that state of affairs on Earth came along much later, around 600BC. We must carefully separate all these events and understand the status quo before and after each.
Well, at least you broke the ice by saying it first: it was space aliens. I can't say exactly what the treatment was, but I feel certain it's related to the pineal gland. Take a look at this carving.
The guys on the outside are "gods", which you can tell by the horns and wings. The other two are some kings or other. But look what's going on with the objects in the hands of the "gods": pine cone-shaped objects pointed directly at the pineal glands of the two human kings. Oh, just random artistic expression, right?
Want to see it from another angle, from the "revelation of the method" that "They" give us? Very long story, but it turns out that "Westworld" is an allegory containing key elements of human interaction with these aliens. In it, the robots are us humans, and the humans are the aliens. One thing they display to us is the ability of these powerful alien "gods" to make us conscious.
In S01E06, Maeve blackmails two of the techs to turn up her "bulk apperception" on a tablet (not a pine cone). After that, she's no longer behaves like a robot but just like a human. Indeed, she has become like them, "knowing good and evil". These are other direct allegorical messages that she has "woken up". It's explained in this article, but they have no idea about the allegory:
What is ‘bulk apperception’? Westworld season 1 episode 6’s Maeve cliffhanger explained
I've been living with this and all the other evidence for several years now, so it all makes sense to me, but I apologize if it comes off to someone new to it as the rantings of a lunatic. I can't stress enough that these are just little blocks in a much larger and coherent pyramid.
I've never read Biglino's work, and had never heard of him before I came to all my conclusions. When I finally ran into one of the handful of translated presentations on video, I thought, "Welp, I guess I wasn't wrong about my bush league translations of Hebrew."
So IDK what he says in his book, but in one of the videos he just sort of grazes by Zecharia Sitchin. I believe Biglino thinks the intersection of "ancient aliens" with the Bible is extremely sensitive to many, so it looked to me like he prudently steered around it as best he could. How much does he really know about it? I couldn't possibly say, but definitely more than he lets on.
SPOILER ALERT: The Bible is 100% about the Anunnaki. There is no question whatsoever. But people get death threats for that kind of talk, and also death for that kind of talk, so I don't blame Biglino.
Another guy that's on to the story is Michael Ledwith. Like Biglino, he has all the cred in the world. For many years, he was on the International Theological Commission, which is the official advisory body on theology to the Pope. You may be interested in this presentation:
Farewell to the Annunaki by Michael Ledwith
If you ask me, he dances around the subject also, but again I don't blame him. It's not in that writeup, but Michael Tellinger relates a story about how Ledwith pointed out a mistranslastion of the very first sentence of the Bible, Gen 1:1.
All ancient Hebrew sacred texts begin with the letter "aleph". Oh, except Genesis. So what happens if you add it back in? You get: "The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the heavens, and the Earth." Changes everything.
So yes, the Elohim are the Anunnaki, and you can reread the OT making that substitution and it not only holds, many puzzles in the text are instantly solved.
One final note since you used the phrase "in the image". It may have been Biglino but I think it was someone else that pointed out that a deep etymology of the word translated as "image", which is the Hebrew word "tselem", shows that it means "cut out", as in a smaller part cut out of a larger part. Not that deep, really, because you can read that right in Strong's. Genetic engineering, anyone?
We have to read very, very closely like that because the people that wrote it down probably had little idea what was really going on. The descriptions given by the Sumerians were even more illustrative, but I always like to stick with the Bible because people are more familiar with it, there are more resources and analysis, and people automatically give more credence to it. Also, they are even now trying to hide the truth with BS translations.
I think you may have misunderstood. The aliens were interacting with humans literally since our inception. What we recognize as "civilization" was rebooted by them in Sumer after the Great Flood. Then a significant change in the relationship between humans and the aliens and that state of affairs on Earth came along much later, around 600BC. We must carefully separate all these events and understand the status quo before and after each.