Just watch the old footage. Cities getting levelled without a slight shake in the camera, firing nuclear artillery shells. The rest of Japan was fire bombed, why not Hirosh and Nag? All their buildings were made from lumber at the time. One shot of napalm on a windy night and it was goodnight Irene.
That doesn't prove anything. You dumbass. You're speculating. It takes a lot more than one shot, multiple bombs, firebombing. Besides ash leaves a very distinct footprint.
Are both real, both a fake/op, or is one real and the other a coverup?
a) perceivable inspiration represents reality; suggested information represents fiction.
b) ones choice to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) shapes fiction within the minds of those who ignore reality, while giving those who suggest it, the power to define; redefine and contradict it.
c) to ignore perceivable for suggested "covers up" ones comprehension of perceivable.
founders of solid
The foundation of temporary solid (living) represents ongoing fluid (process of dying).
The foundation of temporary solid (words) represents ongoing fluid (sound)...the parasitic few suggest solid words (information) to tempt the many to ignore fluid sound (inspiration). Each one who consents to words over sound; willingly upholds solid state information within memory (mind); while ignoring liquid state reality.
created
The parasitic few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything). Living within the process of dying implies being partial (reaction) within whole (enacting). The whole self differentiates into each partial.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...transmutation implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death). That represents ingredient out of base alchemy.
...which implies subjected within a liquid process.
thinking they're fake
How do the many think? In words suggested by the few as solid definitions (words) for a liquid reality (sound). Consenting to suggested words (fiction) over perceivable sound (reality) represents "fake".
Both are real.
a) does perceivable reality communicate fiction towards the perceiving senses of those within or can fiction only be suggested by those within perceivable reality?
b) BOTH, adjective - "two". If one can perceive other ones; then that implies each one to exist at a different position from one another. Counting other ones and then suggesting them to other ones as "two" tempts one (perceiving) to ignore oneness (perceivable).
One represents perceivable inspiration; Two represents suggested information. One cannot perceive two; only count other ones as suggested two.
COUNT, verb - "to number" + NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" = U'NIT, noun [Latin unus; unitas, unity.] - "one"
Just watch the old footage. Cities getting levelled without a slight shake in the camera, firing nuclear artillery shells. The rest of Japan was fire bombed, why not Hirosh and Nag? All their buildings were made from lumber at the time. One shot of napalm on a windy night and it was goodnight Irene.
That doesn't prove anything. You dumbass. You're speculating. It takes a lot more than one shot, multiple bombs, firebombing. Besides ash leaves a very distinct footprint.
a) perceivable inspiration represents reality; suggested information represents fiction.
b) ones choice to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) shapes fiction within the minds of those who ignore reality, while giving those who suggest it, the power to define; redefine and contradict it.
c) to ignore perceivable for suggested "covers up" ones comprehension of perceivable.
The foundation of temporary solid (living) represents ongoing fluid (process of dying).
The foundation of temporary solid (words) represents ongoing fluid (sound)...the parasitic few suggest solid words (information) to tempt the many to ignore fluid sound (inspiration). Each one who consents to words over sound; willingly upholds solid state information within memory (mind); while ignoring liquid state reality.
The parasitic few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything). Living within the process of dying implies being partial (reaction) within whole (enacting). The whole self differentiates into each partial.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...transmutation implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death). That represents ingredient out of base alchemy.
Smart Guy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_earth
Seems like solid subjects. It's only you thinking they're fake. Both are real.
...which implies subjected within a liquid process.
How do the many think? In words suggested by the few as solid definitions (words) for a liquid reality (sound). Consenting to suggested words (fiction) over perceivable sound (reality) represents "fake".
a) does perceivable reality communicate fiction towards the perceiving senses of those within or can fiction only be suggested by those within perceivable reality?
b) BOTH, adjective - "two". If one can perceive other ones; then that implies each one to exist at a different position from one another. Counting other ones and then suggesting them to other ones as "two" tempts one (perceiving) to ignore oneness (perceivable).
One represents perceivable inspiration; Two represents suggested information. One cannot perceive two; only count other ones as suggested two.
COUNT, verb - "to number" + NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" = U'NIT, noun [Latin unus; unitas, unity.] - "one"