It's so bad that if you even mention my user name you will be swarmed with bots and shills saying "BIG MEANIE AXO BANNED ME".
Yeah, I banned the shills, repeatedly, and I have no regrets.
The crazy thing is they try to create this fake reality where I was some sort of "tyrant" who ran the sub at my whim...when literally EVERY moderator action was voted on by the ENTIRE team.
Every single ban given by any /r/conspiracy moderator was scrutinized by the whole mod team, and users that appealed did so again in modmail, in front of everybody.
Every ban given therefore is ultimately decided by the ENTIRE team, not one moderator.
It's clown world levels of insanity that they even attempted to rewrite history to portray me as a tyrant. I was clearly the last thing preventing the sub from being completely infested and overrun.
It's a label that gets recklessly thrown about. Even I have been called a shill. My response was "who am I shilling for?"
A shill I think is someone whose only purpose is to peddle propaganda mobilized by some kind of political operation. Or someone who acts upon, is covertly a representative of someone else. An evil person using a good looking honest looking shill as a disguise and surrogate. Kind of like Obama just being a surrogate for Henry Kissinger or everyone who were SHILLS for Pfizer. Pfizer shills doing the pfizer marketing for free like brainwashed dummies.
I lean more towards not banning. Meaning if someone is unpopular, perhaps has unpopular ideas, but is genuinely an unique person trying to participate in a forum of discussion, then they should at least be allowed to make their often perceived contrarian argument. I kind of like to debate and perceive arguments with such people in the forum as sparring battles. I used to seek out intellectual debates on the internet but eventually realized demoKKKrats do not objectively believe in truth or logic and therefore i was violating the Bible and arguing with fools which the Bible says is folly.
Anyways, moderation is hard work and, at times, probably frustrating. I expect that moderation here lays off until people submit reports. I also trust that moderators here equally apply the rules, unlike government which allows Jew criminals to do whatever the fuck they want like fund invasions of our border or loot the treasury.
I'd actually like to go there to argue with demoKKKRats and make them contradict themselves and see it, but I know it's not fair game and that I'd be heavily censored. I also realize they don't have enough respect for truth and logic to make that the goal of a debate in the first place. You can't win a debate against someone if they don't actually believe in truth as a noble, virtuous, attainable concept.
They removed the good users too, not that it matters.
They've drowned out any real voice with a million bots that spread every conceivable basturdized version of reality so that finding reality is like finding a needle in a haystack.
What's worse is that all those basturdized views of reality aren't happening randomly, but rather, they sync up customized messaging across thousands of population segmentations concurrently and sequentially as if they're being orchestrated by a much more intelligent system, which they likely are.
To add insult to injury, there are likely many of these orchestrators. In fact, there is no reason why entities such as militaries aren't deploying hundreds of there own versions for testing / continuous optimization purposes.
Well there's still some good content there, particularly in /new and usually the self posts. It's one of several dozen sources I routinely check, but literally for only a few moments. I spend a small fraction of the time I used to on reddit, thank god, it's like a huge burden has been lifted. I'm still quite stunned how often I'm "blamed" for the current state of "election denying anti-vax" /r/conspiracy as if I had anything to do with that instead of these topics being clearly important conspiracies of our time.
source
It's so bad that if you even mention my user name you will be swarmed with bots and shills saying "BIG MEANIE AXO BANNED ME".
Yeah, I banned the shills, repeatedly, and I have no regrets.
The crazy thing is they try to create this fake reality where I was some sort of "tyrant" who ran the sub at my whim...when literally EVERY moderator action was voted on by the ENTIRE team.
Every single ban given by any /r/conspiracy moderator was scrutinized by the whole mod team, and users that appealed did so again in modmail, in front of everybody.
Every ban given therefore is ultimately decided by the ENTIRE team, not one moderator.
It's clown world levels of insanity that they even attempted to rewrite history to portray me as a tyrant. I was clearly the last thing preventing the sub from being completely infested and overrun.
The truth will come out, stay tuned.
What is the definition of a "shill" ?
It's a label that gets recklessly thrown about. Even I have been called a shill. My response was "who am I shilling for?"
A shill I think is someone whose only purpose is to peddle propaganda mobilized by some kind of political operation. Or someone who acts upon, is covertly a representative of someone else. An evil person using a good looking honest looking shill as a disguise and surrogate. Kind of like Obama just being a surrogate for Henry Kissinger or everyone who were SHILLS for Pfizer. Pfizer shills doing the pfizer marketing for free like brainwashed dummies.
I lean more towards not banning. Meaning if someone is unpopular, perhaps has unpopular ideas, but is genuinely an unique person trying to participate in a forum of discussion, then they should at least be allowed to make their often perceived contrarian argument. I kind of like to debate and perceive arguments with such people in the forum as sparring battles. I used to seek out intellectual debates on the internet but eventually realized demoKKKrats do not objectively believe in truth or logic and therefore i was violating the Bible and arguing with fools which the Bible says is folly.
Anyways, moderation is hard work and, at times, probably frustrating. I expect that moderation here lays off until people submit reports. I also trust that moderators here equally apply the rules, unlike government which allows Jew criminals to do whatever the fuck they want like fund invasions of our border or loot the treasury.
Don't make yourself a legitimate target by ever using reddit.
Reddit is the AIDS of the internets.
I'd actually like to go there to argue with demoKKKRats and make them contradict themselves and see it, but I know it's not fair game and that I'd be heavily censored. I also realize they don't have enough respect for truth and logic to make that the goal of a debate in the first place. You can't win a debate against someone if they don't actually believe in truth as a noble, virtuous, attainable concept.
You would probably just be talking to bots anyway. Might just as well argue with your television.
Yep, that and casting pearls before swine.
bots and shills who complain about bots and shills will be the end of "100% free speech" forums.
I've been called a bot and shill. I was offended that someone thought a computer program could have a dark humor as complicated as mine.
You were a good one.
They removed the good users too, not that it matters.
They've drowned out any real voice with a million bots that spread every conceivable basturdized version of reality so that finding reality is like finding a needle in a haystack.
What's worse is that all those basturdized views of reality aren't happening randomly, but rather, they sync up customized messaging across thousands of population segmentations concurrently and sequentially as if they're being orchestrated by a much more intelligent system, which they likely are.
To add insult to injury, there are likely many of these orchestrators. In fact, there is no reason why entities such as militaries aren't deploying hundreds of there own versions for testing / continuous optimization purposes.
Dead internet theory.
Axo, why do you still go there?
Well there's still some good content there, particularly in /new and usually the self posts. It's one of several dozen sources I routinely check, but literally for only a few moments. I spend a small fraction of the time I used to on reddit, thank god, it's like a huge burden has been lifted. I'm still quite stunned how often I'm "blamed" for the current state of "election denying anti-vax" /r/conspiracy as if I had anything to do with that instead of these topics being clearly important conspiracies of our time.
lol