The theory provides an explanation for how a chain of descendant universes (each resulting from a previous black hole) would “select for” (akin to natural selection) universes which contain complexity - and thus the potential for more “offspring” from that universe.
It very elegantly explains their fine tuning - selection towards complexity as an analogue of biological fecundity. How do you figure it doesn’t?
edit4youredit - what needs explaining isn’t the simple presence of “constants”, what demands an explanation is why these constants, which could have taken literally any values, have the values that result in a universe that doesn’t instantly decompose but instead persists for billions of years creating progressively more complexity... seriously...read the link/watch the video and quit yapping in ignorance
How do you explain the fine tuning of the universal “constants”?
How does a black hole explain them?
The theory provides an explanation for how a chain of descendant universes (each resulting from a previous black hole) would “select for” (akin to natural selection) universes which contain complexity - and thus the potential for more “offspring” from that universe.
Just watch the video lol
That doesn't explain universal constants at all.
Moreover I see no problem with our universe having constants, so that doesn't need to be resolved using this theory as a solution.
It very elegantly explains their fine tuning - selection towards complexity as an analogue of biological fecundity. How do you figure it doesn’t?
edit4youredit - what needs explaining isn’t the simple presence of “constants”, what demands an explanation is why these constants, which could have taken literally any values, have the values that result in a universe that doesn’t instantly decompose but instead persists for billions of years creating progressively more complexity... seriously...read the link/watch the video and quit yapping in ignorance