Uranium One - not 20% of uranium reserves. It's worse.
It was a deal to hand-over 20% the USA's production capacity to Putin.
More to the point:
A deal to hand-over uranium processing technologies, to Putin.
Hillary was masterful at that - finding ways to give USA tech to other countries.
It is perfect unlimited feeding-rack for cohort of hihg-ranked electromagnetic plasma contamination adepts who at the same time actively suppress financing of other, much more promiseable approaches to fusion reactors.
Could be funny if wasn't so sad.
Exactly. Next generation, built for 2x price will have 7200s runtime. :)
Me too. :) And LPG, and gas, and wood and even PE,PP,PET garbage. More CO2 to atmosphere! Let's make our planet green from pole to pole again!
Really not that simple. For average house you need 3-5kW, so for 20 min you need 1kWh, or, say 2 car batteries. But you use that storage rarely, and batteries dies within few years even on floating charge. All that lithium crap is overpriced as fuck. But you need readily availabe energy even after a year of idling. And other variants of ready-to-use storage are highly ineffective. You need tons of water at 10 meters, or find out a way to use a weight of whole house to store that 1kW. I didn't find any simple, reliable and long-lasting way to store electricity in decent amounts. Either it is unreliable as car batteries, or overpriced, or overcomplicated, or all of them like lithium batteries or extracting and pressurising CO2.
Regular gasoline generators are OK. Relatively cheap, powerful, affordable spare parts and so on. Really, you could run them on nearly anything flammabe, gas, LPG, methane, alcohol, whatever. Diesel could run on oil-alcohol mix, but they are not the best thing to start at winter. But they need some love and care to be ready-to-go.
Will gladly bury RITEG on backyard and forget about any energy problems for 30-50 years. Really it will work much longer, for centuries, but with lower output.