Weirdo globe shill
(media.scored.co)
Comments (100)
sorted by:
u/dipshit8841
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/15Jn6g2vmY/x/c
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/15JnG5deiP/rockwall-texas-a-hidden-remnant-/c
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/15JnBMhtWo/flat-earth-talking-points-just-p/c
^ the three posts they copy and pasted the fed flat earth comment to
Strange behaviour, imo
It's probably because there's no point in having a discussion with flat Earther as they're only here to undermine and subvert.
I've wasted so much time debunking every piece of supposed evidence, only to have them ignore it and move to another piece.
Now it's just ad hominim attacks on "opponents" who might not even be real people.
The sun rises in the East and sets in the West, the Earth is not flat.
No, wheedle, you haven’t spent time debunking shit
I’ve seen you vomit out the same “point” day after day, one discussion to the next, as if you are blind to the evidence presented against your points you think you are making
We all have seen this
You keep mentioning the sun rising in the east and setting in the west as if it’s some sort of mic drop
“Get a frisbee and a ball. Boom. Flat earth btfo, idiots.”
Consider the plethora of evidence against the spinning globe model or remain ignorant and pathetic, but defending the globe with your non-evidence and condescending remarks is even worse
Imagine going to battle for the same people who lie and steal from you, fighting the good guys calling out the deception
You’re the allied forces in ww2 right now
That's cause the earth is flat and unmoving just as most cosmologies in history depicted. The feds just want to ensure we stay cattle instead of knowing the truth of our Creator, and we are the center of creation.
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/15JnKl9gRN/eric-dubay-top-20-proofs-explore/c
Shill is still at it, days later
Lol this entire thread is about dipshit8841 being a fed. Can I get a job with you spamming anti flat earth stuff?
Nah i would have to get paid to lie about this hyliocentic big bang nonsense being true.
They wouldn't take me cause I am a pure blood.
Speaking of McGocart, on his raving and ranting about mods, it's been a bit much.
As for the flat earthers, it seems to be a mix fof loonies and forum diluters.
Investigate if the moonlandings are real. Then look into if the ISS is real. Then see if you can find any real images of planets, satellites in space, far side of the moon, Tesla's in space etc...
If you concluded all these things are BS, revisit investigating earths cosmology at that time.
Then show me a real photo of saturn. We have allegedly sent probes to every planet in our solar system, so it should be no problem for you. All you are going to find is fake images like in this video:
https://youtu.be/d7u5Yt_Twh4
Prove me wrong.
Send me the most convincing one! You can't bitch cause you know they are all fake!
We all grew up watching movies, TV, playing video games. We can compare whatever example you come up with, with things we know are fake. But not one of you will produce a single example cause you are pussies who aren't confident on your stance. Nut up, or shut up.
This week Jupiter was visible to everyone on its closest approach in decades, and if you had decent binoculars you could see it and even its larger moons with your own eyes. Many people did. Space isn't fake, round Earth isn't fake, round planets aren't fake.
All you are seeing is a luminary in the sky just like the other stars, only the planets are wandering stars just as the ancients called them. Stars and planets simply look like lights in water when you zoom in on them. They are not trillions of miles away, that would be impossible to see. The sun is small just at 8 light minutes away, imagine how small it would be at 3.7 light years, which is allegedly the closest star.
Here's a question for you, how come we never see venus as a crescent like the moon? It has a smaller orbit than earth, so we should never be able to see a full venus because it is never on the opposite side of earth from the sun. Venus always looks like very bright star.
Try investigsting Earth's geometry some time...
Sun rises in the East and sets in the West, FE is retarded.
I first suspected flat earth because, I kept making observations of objects that should have been far beyond the curve of the earth, assuming we are indeed on a sphere of 24,901 miles in circumference.
I worked at JPL in a group processing images we got from space with our group's satellite, sorry - earth not flat, space is real. End of argument.
Can you show me any of these images? And not something that could be taken by a spy plane at high altitude. It can be any photo you want long as it could only have been produced in low earth orbit or further.
I don't keep a personal store of satellite images, so, no.
Well then find something on Google that you are convinced is real, that could not be taken by a spy plane. Here ill give you a few to consider.
Is this a real tesla in space with sphere earth on the background? https://hdqwalls.com/wallpaper/2048x2048/tesla-roadster-into-space-with-space-suit-man
Is this a real picture of saturn? https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2021/04/10414392/what-is-saturn-return-2021-meaning
Is this a real picture of Mars surface taken by a rover, or is it Devon Island Canada with a red tint? https://www.firstpost.com/tech/science/mars-3-to-4-billion-years-ago-was-warm-enough-to-have-rainstorms-and-support-life-7205281.html
How the hell do I know what some image on the Internet came from. Impossible task. Sorry to say I am not in the business of validating that space is real.
And I'm not going to get into Stanley Kubrick conspiracy theory.
I do know though that images I saw on screens at JPL, in real time from space, were real.
You got fed data that you were told is from a satellite. Don’t pretend like you have proven anything.
I was simply asking does it look real? Very easy question, you don't have to be right. Do any of those look real to you? If not, then search for some that do look real to you.
Took me a while to find this video. It's a bit long but maybe you'll get a kick out of it even if it's bs. It's a good summary of how satellites, particularly their data, is replicated with land, air, and sea based technology. I'm not asking you to consider flat earth, just asking you to question Nasa and other space programs/companies.
https://youtu.be/9pVXwK7X-T4
Dude, I worked at NASA's JPL on satellites. Claims that satellite data is faked are flat out wrong. The YouTube video is complete bullshit wrong. I worked with ocean data images straight off our department's satellite, the SeaSat. I can only speak for our group, not others, but the fact that I had hands-on directly with the images means the data was real. The data could only come view from orbit up on high, not from a plane. End of story.
People watch rockets get launched and the rockets put visible satellites in orbit. Although I never got to go to space shuttle launches, other people I know did. They saw the shuttle go up. The shuttle deployed satellites in orbit. It's real and I'm plenty tired of people telling me it's not real.
I dont know how far you got in the video but I don't see what kind of data could 'only come from orbit'. We have enough technology available to make all sorts of observations within earth's atmosphere. We have countless satellite balloons released constantly floating through the sky, doppler radar, drones that can stay aloft for weeks recharged with solar, weather buoys throughout the ocean, spy planes etc. I'm not sure what kind of data you guys worked with, but if we are talking about weather, it is all done with a network of technology in earth's atmosphere, and like the video showed it would be simple to create a program to project the data on a spherical earth. So what data did you have that could only be acquired from orbit, and not some other technology?
The moonlandings are so fake I would bet every cent I had on it. The ISS footage is laughably fake as well if you bother to watch any breakdowns on it, so I know we've never put a man in space. When you compare the size of an average satellite to a commercial jet, and then consider they are hundreds or thousands of miles further away, how the fuck is it possible to see them? Jets are difficult to see when they are only 7 miles high. That "satellite" we see at night can be anything from a drone, project bluebeam, projection on the firmament, natural phenomenon, I have no idea but it not like I can see with my own eyes what it is. Every video I've ever seen of a rocket going to space it simply looks like they launch it into the Bermuda triangle where it either sinks or is recovered. It does not look like it's going to space.
Did you get to that last part of the video where he is questioning a Nasa mission operations manager on the position and data received from the Hubbell satellite? I don't see how you can watch that and not rethink what you know. He freaked out a 25 year employee because he could not confirm the position of the satellite, and had never received live data from Hubbell. And there are planes fitted with the same equipment as Hubbell.
Any pics of Antarctica you can share?
We didn't fly a polar orbit. We flew circumferentially and gathered broad oceanic data. Interestingly, we had a foreign agent in our group; it was my first experience with being a target of spying. When we orbited over Russia we had to turn the radar off, or we could have caused a war. But we accidentally detected subsurface submarines elsewhere and the military stepped in and shut us down. Much of the project has been wiped from public records. This taught me that there are some lies about some of the space programs.
There is nothing dumber than someone who believes jew lies over his own senses.
It’s disappointing for sure
And for people on a conspiracy community, no less…
I tend to think I’m interacting with actual shills who are knowingly being obtuse and intentionally being disingenuous
yeah, lots of pedo feds getting paid to lie
Not a professor Dave is so fucking punchable
Looks and acts like a Jew
Intentionally ignorant when he knows he’s caught on a point
Incredibly condescending, smug, and SO FUCKING PUNCHABLE when talking flat earth
Did you see his video with David Weiss? Weiss had him caught up but then they ended the discussion
Pointing out how if it’s the angle of the suns rays giving us our wildly different temperatures between seasons, then why not extreme temperature changes every single day while the earth supposedly spins?
If 23.3 degree tilt is enough to make a seasonal difference, then surely when the earth is fully pointing away every night it should experience even more of an extreme temp change
We’re supposedly closer to the sun during the northern hemisphere winter months yet we are told it’s much colder because the earth is pointing away from the sun
Fucking embarrassing that people don’t question this
All Flat Earth Posters are Feds or Fed Shills
-blocked-