I have pointed out numerous errors on your posts time and time again...you fail to do the math to show anything....you make stupid nonsequitors to avoid meaty deep dives....so what's the point...you ignored then.....that's bad faith on your part.
Can you acknowledge that acceleration still exists?
Say I lift off, if I am not Calibrating for any perceived 'ahift' the pilot would likely not get his license. So first off, I think a lot of this is steady and pretty subtle at our time frame and scales of reference. So when the plane moves, it's accelerating relative to the ground ....so that relative frame of reference is important because it is how we 'measure' speed..
The velocity of the plane relative to the center....is another matter entirely (angular velocity matters there and so does angular momentum. What I mean is that the plane is being brought around with the earths system. Which also includes the ground reference point. So when we accelerate and measure out speed it is towards the ground ..but that moves with reference to the center....does that make sense?
So the reason you don't feel the perceived difference is because your always referencing the ground, but not the center.
I have pointed out numerous errors on your posts time and time again...you fail to do the math to show anything....you make stupid nonsequitors to avoid meaty deep dives....so what's the point...you ignored then.....that's bad faith on your part.
You math was wrong....just sorry...but that's how the math calculation works.
You want to redefine math too to make it work???
You misunderstood change in velocity...as in what that even means.....you need a reference....so what is the reference???
--
You also don't realise that angular momentum and angular velocity are at play.... Which have different references to your 'observations'
Can you acknowledge that acceleration still exists?
Say I lift off, if I am not Calibrating for any perceived 'ahift' the pilot would likely not get his license. So first off, I think a lot of this is steady and pretty subtle at our time frame and scales of reference. So when the plane moves, it's accelerating relative to the ground ....so that relative frame of reference is important because it is how we 'measure' speed..
The velocity of the plane relative to the center....is another matter entirely (angular velocity matters there and so does angular momentum. What I mean is that the plane is being brought around with the earths system. Which also includes the ground reference point. So when we accelerate and measure out speed it is towards the ground ..but that moves with reference to the center....does that make sense?
So the reason you don't feel the perceived difference is because your always referencing the ground, but not the center.