But I don't think it quite works like this. Namely that timing. Every 12,000 years the sun goes poof. Just because it does. No. Sorry. I don't accept that.
Same here. Because that's not how the theory works.
It's not a stopwatch and it's subjective to how any cycle occurs. If indeed there is a definite pattern. There isn't at all. Apart from inconclusive events have impacted our geology in the last 100k years. Of this the supervolcano, ice-age, and impact or nova. Until even the geology has been fed into narratives. The main narrative of evolution. It needed neanderthals in caves from an ice-age without it recognising impact, because no civilization existed prior to cavemen. Despite documenting the Supervolcano.
This is remarkably laughable in the British Natural History museum. One exhibit claims out of Africa, the next claims a supervolcano, another theory was the supervolcano caused evolution. Finally there was this other fucking ice-age after. You can literally go to the exhibits from the paleontology monkey skulls, reading the labels, going into the geology volcanoes and earthquakes, or which ever first, and the labels clearly conflict in the information provided. Hilariously. Above. Supervolcano ice-aged them out of Africa? Did it evolve the monkeys? Or did they leave their caves after an ice age and build pyramids next? I mean it's the thing to do after being in a cave. But prior to them leaving Africa there was this big huge eruption. Maybe they changed those labels now. God damn, it was ridiculous.
Okay, but no. There is no definite answer, just contrary theories.
Same here. Because that's not how the theory works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0MXv1vuF_g (10:25)
Here's a review of the mechanism that replaces 'just because'. Link below is a playlist that lays out the whole shebang.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihwoIlxHI3Q&list=PLHSoxioQtwZf1-8QeggXIVdZ-abyJXaO1
If the catastrophe cycle theory is faulty, you'll be able to detect that here.
It's not a stopwatch and it's subjective to how any cycle occurs. If indeed there is a definite pattern. There isn't at all. Apart from inconclusive events have impacted our geology in the last 100k years. Of this the supervolcano, ice-age, and impact or nova. Until even the geology has been fed into narratives. The main narrative of evolution. It needed neanderthals in caves from an ice-age without it recognising impact, because no civilization existed prior to cavemen. Despite documenting the Supervolcano.
This is remarkably laughable in the British Natural History museum. One exhibit claims out of Africa, the next claims a supervolcano, another theory was the supervolcano caused evolution. Finally there was this other fucking ice-age after. You can literally go to the exhibits from the paleontology monkey skulls, reading the labels, going into the geology volcanoes and earthquakes, or which ever first, and the labels clearly conflict in the information provided. Hilariously. Above. Supervolcano ice-aged them out of Africa? Did it evolve the monkeys? Or did they leave their caves after an ice age and build pyramids next? I mean it's the thing to do after being in a cave. But prior to them leaving Africa there was this big huge eruption. Maybe they changed those labels now. God damn, it was ridiculous.
Okay, but no. There is no definite answer, just contrary theories.