not just resisting their propaganda

a) PROP'AGATE, verb (Latin propago; to set or thrust in) - "to continue or multiply the kind by generation or successive production". The process of dying represents the generator; those living within represent the reactors "resisting".

The parasitic few suggest propagandism (orders to follow) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable propagation (the natural order to resist).

Your choice to fight those who suggest propagandism represents your choice to ignore resisting propagation. The few parasitically exploit your ignorance of perceivable (reality) with suggestion (fiction).

b) nobody can offer reality because everything perceivable is already offered to each one perceiving it; yet...everyone can be tempted to ignore perceivable (need) for the suggestions (want) by others. This temptation needs to be resisted by choosing need (perceivable inspiration) over want (suggested information).

c) as choice one exists within perceivable balance (need/want) aka in-between perceivable and suggested aka inside the perceivable process of dying and among the suggestions of the living. The many ignore this for the suggested imbalance (want vs not want) by the few.

d) one cannot consent to an us (want) vs them (not want) conflict without ignoring the need to sustain oneself. One cannot consent to any conflict (imbalance) without ignoring ones response-ability (choice) to struggle (balance). One cannot consent to another one without ignoring oneself within all. Choice cannot consent to suggested choices without ignoring perceivable balance.

killing the people killing us

a) flow (inception towards death) kills form (life)...it also generates it. The generated form (living) represents the reactor within generating flow (process of dying).

b) KILL, verb - "to deprive of life by any means"...nothing deprives the living faster than ignoring to resist the temptation of dying, and consenting to any suggestion represents ignorance.

c) DEPRIVE, verb - "to take from; to bereave of something possessed"...others cannot take perceivable reality from one and one cannot posses perceivable reality. It's the choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable) which allows those who suggest to exploit those who want suggested. Only then can the suggested be reclaimed; repossessed and taken from those who want it.

d) while the many are fighting each other over suggested values; the few suggest them price-tags for everything perceivable. Consenting to those suggested prices restricts the many from accessing perceivable. All of this represents willing self destruction...not getting killed by others.

e) the ignorance of the many tempts the parasitic response of the few. Killing the few doesn't prevent the ignorance of the many; it strengthens the few; because the many can shirk response-ability (choice) onto the choices of the few aka the ELITE (selection; choice).

As long as each one of the many ignores response-ability (choice) within perceivable (balance) for the suggested choices by the few; so long will the few represent the "chosen ones".

To not be “against others”

a) you are already against yourself by consenting to suggested "not be" aka not being aka suggested nothing over being within perceivable everything.

b) the "to" represents towards which implies being (life) within what moves forwards (inception towards death).

c) choice can only exist at the center of balance, so only if choices chooses to ignore being within balance; can choice experience imbalance (conflict). Where is the conflict (against) for one living within the process of dying; for form (life) within flow (inception towards death); for choice within balance; for reaction within enacting; for the partial within the whole?

literal suicide

a) "need" sustains living; "want" tempts dying...both coexist as balance for ones choice at the center.

b) the few suggest suicide under the umbrella of moralism (want) vs immorality (not want) to tempt the many to ignore response-ability (choice) of the living (resistance) within the process of dying (temptation).

To reason over wanting or not wanting to live; tempts one to ignore being alive; hence already doing what's needed to be alive aka adaptation to perceivable need (breathing; quenching thirst; stilling hunger; sheltering).

tl;dr

To be implies out of; within and in response to perceivable origin...however others choose to be represents the temptation to ignore what you are. Killing doesn't solve problems...living represents the temporary problem within the ongoing solution (process of dying). Every problem will be solved.