well first off the electron microscope shouldn't even been used in biology. Harold Hillman said numerous times that the cellur model might not even be correct because the electron microscope process is very destructive and causes artifacting.
the little globules of partial DNA are simply the fragments of a dead cell. thats why they cant isolate it. theres no grabbing, they have never ever isolated a virus. they even admit this.
I think you may have been mistaken about the process of "isolation". See its never ever happened, thats what this whole deal is about
what they did in the past is mix cells from a sick person with a bunch of other cells (like diseased monkey kidney cells and baby horse blood) to make a cell culture. then inject that same diseased toxic mess into different animals. like inject it into the brain and see if they get ill or die. or cut there throats oppen and pour right in the tissue. most die because well, they get toxic dead cell tissues injected into there organs. this is how they proved viruses make us sick and are contagious...
then came the PCR, which doesn't isolate anything either, just gives you a tiny reading of DNA so small that its meaningless and also gets increasing less accurate as the cycles go up. even now they have never isolated any virus ever.
I can't agree with much of what you said. I studied cell biology and other biology at a really good university for it. My cell biology bio lab course used electron microscopes, and we simply coated cells with a thin layer of gold and photographed that. The beam reflected from the gold and that was that. We got good images cleanly representing the cell. Sure, a 'naked' cell will get blasted if the beam is strong enough. These days, the E-Ms have advanced a lot and get images from weak beams.
On the rest of the items, no, the ideas are incorrect. I am not attacking you with mean intent here but you have lots of mistaken wrong ideas.
There is something wrong in Bailey's head, he twists things too much.
[ well okay, you Dunning-Kroeger downvoters who never studied biology. I'm not going to waste my time posting links to counter where you are knowably wrong.]
well first off the electron microscope shouldn't even been used in biology. Harold Hillman said numerous times that the cellur model might not even be correct because the electron microscope process is very destructive and causes artifacting.
the little globules of partial DNA are simply the fragments of a dead cell. thats why they cant isolate it. theres no grabbing, they have never ever isolated a virus. they even admit this.
I think you may have been mistaken about the process of "isolation". See its never ever happened, thats what this whole deal is about
what they did in the past is mix cells from a sick person with a bunch of other cells (like diseased monkey kidney cells and baby horse blood) to make a cell culture. then inject that same diseased toxic mess into different animals. like inject it into the brain and see if they get ill or die. or cut there throats oppen and pour right in the tissue. most die because well, they get toxic dead cell tissues injected into there organs. this is how they proved viruses make us sick and are contagious...
then came the PCR, which doesn't isolate anything either, just gives you a tiny reading of DNA so small that its meaningless and also gets increasing less accurate as the cycles go up. even now they have never isolated any virus ever.
also i believe you may be talking about The Tobacco Mosaic Virus. if so the Bailys covered that also - https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/tobacco-mosaic-virus-the-beginning-and-end-of-virology/
I can't agree with much of what you said. I studied cell biology and other biology at a really good university for it. My cell biology bio lab course used electron microscopes, and we simply coated cells with a thin layer of gold and photographed that. The beam reflected from the gold and that was that. We got good images cleanly representing the cell. Sure, a 'naked' cell will get blasted if the beam is strong enough. These days, the E-Ms have advanced a lot and get images from weak beams. On the rest of the items, no, the ideas are incorrect. I am not attacking you with mean intent here but you have lots of mistaken wrong ideas. There is something wrong in Bailey's head, he twists things too much. [ well okay, you Dunning-Kroeger downvoters who never studied biology. I'm not going to waste my time posting links to counter where you are knowably wrong.]