So it isn't at all intriguing to you the experiments where they show that you can see things you shouldn't be able to see based on the curvature measurements? Are you saying these tests are inaccurate?
I am not sure if those experiments are accurate. If they are, I find that pretty damning of what we've been told about the Earth. No?
I 100% agree. I don't "believe" in any model, because most of what we believe about basically everything was taught to us, from a young age, by government employees in a reeducation camp. It makes no sense that the earth would be flat and that space is fake, and it's embarrassing to admit that I am interested in the stuff, but it's simply impossible to ignore, once you see them, the videos of space and Mars and the space station being faked, and the lasers / windmills / etc. reaching so far beyond the horizon that they should be dozens of feet below the horizon, and then you see horizon behind them, etc. I recommend this guy's videos: https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c
Not sure if it was you or someone else posted Taboo the other day and I went on a SPREE. Really enjoy it. I find these guys really seem to make sensible points. And then when the Token Scientist in the comments chimes in its always wildly complex and difficult to understand. This concerns me because in all my years, I've always felt that truth can be explained simply. Austrian economics is very simple but when you hear it, it clicks, it makes sense. Keynesianism, the government lie economics, is overly complex and confusing. So when I hear that well, the reason the Earth curve might SEEM wrong is because of THIS chart and THIS phenomenon that happens due to THIS ratio which can be calculated using the Duagagmaloof Continuum to the square root of Cockabooloo, I am now looking sideways at them. And then the FE stuff just snaps in- ah, this astronaut is lying. Ah, the horizon is still flat on Mount Everest. Ah, the satellites have damn balloons attached to them. But then yes, it is embarrassing and hard to talk about with people. And frankly I just can't really be sure if the conspiracy vids are being truthful or if the tests they do were accurately conducted. What a conundrum it all is. But as time passes, if you held my hand to the fire and forced me to choose, in my uncertainty I am more convinced that massive lies are being fed to us. Massive. And if it could ever be proven it would, in my view, wake people up IMMEDIATELY. Even the sleepiest normie would instantly wake up if FE was legit and could be proven. But....is it? Can it? Remains to be seen.
Secondly, I could not agree more with your sentiment about Austrian School versus Keynesian. I remember back in the day how shocked I was when I learned that the "economics" programs available in every major university in the United States were teaching Keynesian "economics".
It was me who mentioned Taboo, maybe a week ago.
I feel the same way, that I'm not sure what to believe, but that I'm certain NASA is lying and using CGI and that there are at least some satellites up there on balloons, and all the other stuff. It's just the implications are so enormous. If it's true, what does that mean? Are we living in a petri dish, is the world much bigger and broken into zones, etc. it's all so ridiculous, but also... impossible to ignore.
So it isn't at all intriguing to you the experiments where they show that you can see things you shouldn't be able to see based on the curvature measurements? Are you saying these tests are inaccurate?
I am not sure if those experiments are accurate. If they are, I find that pretty damning of what we've been told about the Earth. No?
I 100% agree. I don't "believe" in any model, because most of what we believe about basically everything was taught to us, from a young age, by government employees in a reeducation camp. It makes no sense that the earth would be flat and that space is fake, and it's embarrassing to admit that I am interested in the stuff, but it's simply impossible to ignore, once you see them, the videos of space and Mars and the space station being faked, and the lasers / windmills / etc. reaching so far beyond the horizon that they should be dozens of feet below the horizon, and then you see horizon behind them, etc. I recommend this guy's videos: https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c
Not sure if it was you or someone else posted Taboo the other day and I went on a SPREE. Really enjoy it. I find these guys really seem to make sensible points. And then when the Token Scientist in the comments chimes in its always wildly complex and difficult to understand. This concerns me because in all my years, I've always felt that truth can be explained simply. Austrian economics is very simple but when you hear it, it clicks, it makes sense. Keynesianism, the government lie economics, is overly complex and confusing. So when I hear that well, the reason the Earth curve might SEEM wrong is because of THIS chart and THIS phenomenon that happens due to THIS ratio which can be calculated using the Duagagmaloof Continuum to the square root of Cockabooloo, I am now looking sideways at them. And then the FE stuff just snaps in- ah, this astronaut is lying. Ah, the horizon is still flat on Mount Everest. Ah, the satellites have damn balloons attached to them. But then yes, it is embarrassing and hard to talk about with people. And frankly I just can't really be sure if the conspiracy vids are being truthful or if the tests they do were accurately conducted. What a conundrum it all is. But as time passes, if you held my hand to the fire and forced me to choose, in my uncertainty I am more convinced that massive lies are being fed to us. Massive. And if it could ever be proven it would, in my view, wake people up IMMEDIATELY. Even the sleepiest normie would instantly wake up if FE was legit and could be proven. But....is it? Can it? Remains to be seen.
Firstly, I ROFLMAO @ "Duagagmaloof Continuum".
Secondly, I could not agree more with your sentiment about Austrian School versus Keynesian. I remember back in the day how shocked I was when I learned that the "economics" programs available in every major university in the United States were teaching Keynesian "economics".
It was me who mentioned Taboo, maybe a week ago.
I feel the same way, that I'm not sure what to believe, but that I'm certain NASA is lying and using CGI and that there are at least some satellites up there on balloons, and all the other stuff. It's just the implications are so enormous. If it's true, what does that mean? Are we living in a petri dish, is the world much bigger and broken into zones, etc. it's all so ridiculous, but also... impossible to ignore.