Look, there is no need for the whitepaper to be published by a leading institution or the like, so anyone with the information could produce a white paper worth reviewing. So there really is no reason one is not there if the people in the 'field' had an inclination to produce one.
All of your other claims, are merely left to the interpreter you can easily fool yourself by not understanding the inputs or by making assumptions.
To suggest the idea of a flat earth is not thousands of years old is foolish, it is also funny to consider that the first model we came up with to describe shit has any merit.
Based on your inputs so far, I am not clear on why you accept flat earth, nevermind clutch to it dearly and reject all other inputs.
is it the correct book? I will give it a bit of a squeeze.
No my assumptions are not idiotic when it comes to laying down trust to the ideas of the past, while much of the usable science they produced is still viable most of the ideas are not. Any ideas used to subjugate and control get an extra layer of analysis.
So when it comes to anything that was used to educate and enforce belief and control is likely a tool forged in corruption.
I will say it again, I feel no need to prove or disprove a given theory be it round or flat. The goal is to understand available information. There are many reasons why such things are produced and it is mostly to take away time and ability.
My own position is that physically a flat earth does not make any sense. I feel that in order to even accept flat earth you must have something else driving it.
Look, there is no need for the whitepaper to be published by a leading institution or the like, so anyone with the information could produce a white paper worth reviewing. So there really is no reason one is not there if the people in the 'field' had an inclination to produce one.
All of your other claims, are merely left to the interpreter you can easily fool yourself by not understanding the inputs or by making assumptions.
To suggest the idea of a flat earth is not thousands of years old is foolish, it is also funny to consider that the first model we came up with to describe shit has any merit.
Based on your inputs so far, I am not clear on why you accept flat earth, nevermind clutch to it dearly and reject all other inputs.
Starting with your book reference, its like you don't want me to check it out? an amazon link?
Here is a pdf link from some of your brethren: https://flatearthers.org/Zetetic-Astronomy-Earth-Not-a-Globe-1881.pdf
is it the correct book? I will give it a bit of a squeeze.
No my assumptions are not idiotic when it comes to laying down trust to the ideas of the past, while much of the usable science they produced is still viable most of the ideas are not. Any ideas used to subjugate and control get an extra layer of analysis.
So when it comes to anything that was used to educate and enforce belief and control is likely a tool forged in corruption.
I will say it again, I feel no need to prove or disprove a given theory be it round or flat. The goal is to understand available information. There are many reasons why such things are produced and it is mostly to take away time and ability.
My own position is that physically a flat earth does not make any sense. I feel that in order to even accept flat earth you must have something else driving it.