why get so hung up on Latin though?

Because Pig-Latin (English) represents the ongoing revisionism thereof; robbed of all the natural connotations; filled to the brim with rhetorical subversion; used in layers for legalese and numerology; and it represents the recent slave language used to design the suggested narratives.

it's been with us for so long

According to those who can edit "dark-ages" and periods hundreds of millions of years ago into their suggested his-story; while simultaneously suggesting 24/7 doomsday forecasts about the horrors to come.

it's broken when it comes to etymology

• ETYMOL'OGY, noun [Greek true, and discourse.] - "that part of philology which explains the origin and derivation of words"

a) each one (living) represents the expression within origin (process of dying)

b) the origin of suggested words represents perceivable sound. The parasitic few suggest words like "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore the perceivable implication of "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound); hence being within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound.

Words over sound represents spell-craft, hence the few crafting the spelling of the many with suggested brands (information), slapped upon a moving system perceivable (inspiration).

it's nothing but a word play at this point

a) "it's" aka "it is" implies perceivable something; while suggested nothing contradicts it.

b) the few suggest games to tempt the many to ignore the need to respond to perceivable origin for the want for suggested outcomes (progressivism).

c) deconstructing revisionism makes it harder for ignorance to hide behind the suggested meaning of words. Whatever definition of words one suggests as "truth"; I can almost effortlessly contradict by comprehending perceivable motion as the foundation for each affixed word suggested within.

As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) all suggested words tempt one to hold onto form; while ignoring flow. The few suggest labels for a moving system; and the consent of the many tempts them into reasoning against each other over the suggested labels...labels defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted (talmudic reasoning) by the those suggesting them.

do ancient Greek sometimes, it bears far more interesting results

I was about to deep dive into Greek; Hebrew, and a bunch of Nordic languages when I started to comprehend the perceivable sound underneath the suggested words. Now the temptation to learn languages lost potency; because I can read more and more into the expression within perceivable sound and notice endless contradictions the suggested words are causing.

Agreement vs disagreement among choices doesn't represents communication; only choice reacting to enacted balance (need/want) represents communication. In other words...adhering to perceivable need represents resonance with the source of sound; while ignoring it for suggested wants represents dissonance among those who ignore to resonate.

interesting results

IN'TEREST, verb [Latin inter and esse.] implies being within essence (aka living within the process of dying); hence the result of it. As the consequence one needs to respond to cause; while resisting the temptation to want to respond to other consequences.

If all represents one in energy; then perceivable others represent inspiration (need) and temptation (want) for oneself aka a balance (need/want) for ones choice at the center. The comprehension of being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) has to be grown; while others exploit the ignorance thereof by suggesting togetherness.

Allow yourself to question suggested "two"...for one thing to be perceivable; it has to be different from every other one. One cannot perceive sameness; others can suggest likeness as sameness to tempt one to ignore differences. Show me "two" things and I point out that each "one" of them exists at a different place to be perceivable.