Decolonizing and Demilitarizing Russia
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
What sanctions?
Seriously?
Where have you been?
Under a rock?
What sanctions is a dumb question.
Seriously.
Your pay grade. You have some other dumb notion. Point and click. See how easy you're pointed, now click, because you're winning. What. It wasn't the point.
The point of it was about as obvious as the village idiot. He's an idiot obviously. I mean seriously the point was causing an agenda in line with all the other change being forced. Presto it has been, and all they needed was somebody to blame for it. You vill pay more for electricity, food, and bugs, because it's so much better. No why. Just blame Russia. Simple. Like that, you're now buying even more electricity, and it stops the weather. No, it doesn't. But that's not the point. The point was forcing change. It simply needs a catalyst, or things don't change quickly. Now they're, because there's no gas, the supply lines are redistributing. How easy was it turning it off. Fetch Russia.
Seriously, what sanctions dumbass.
This is an incoherent mess that makes zero sense.
You obviously have no clue in what you write.
As in a case of TL;DR effect.
Anyone who really knows what they are talking about can express it in a few words and with simplicity, as I have already demonstrated.
Let me express the truth again, simply and in a few words.
America's has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests. Full stop.
Anything beyond that is dellusional.
You make no sense. You're really fucking dumb.
What did Russia do that wasn't expected? Tell me please? Turn off the gas. Suddenly out of the blue? When the West has been selling EVs and climate change. Omg it's unexpectedly shocking. Attack Ukraine when Ukraine has been telling it to give up the Crimea for the past decade? I mean what?
Cause the West to collapse. Hahaha. Get bent. Has Russia attacked the West? Contrarily who prompted Russia? But you're winning. Keep on trying. Laughable.
Simple agenda causing change needs a catalyst or things don't change quickly.
Perhaps there still might be a winner here. Not its point. Obviously Russia needs to win something still. If it loses in the Ukraine, it will be worse. But it will drag until change is forced. Because that was the point.
Or try to do something unexpected?
Well, your focus is minute.
Obviously don't understand geopolitics through foreign policy objectives.
Carry on.
I follow the advice of George Carlin.
End transmission.